Welcome another new year. Personally, I am not sad to see the old one fade away. Much to look forward to in the coming year. For this blog we have a birthday...The SWE will be 6 years old on January 19. Hard to believe it has been 6 years!
Jon probably just wanted attention. Much like his other interviews where he claimed he was going to file for custody.
They love that Jon has changed history. Doncha know that TLC is the evil that made him look bad. Jon stopped filming because the children were going through the divorce. TLC planted pics of Jon romping through France with Hailey, they made him sell out the twins' birthday to ET (after he stopped the filming of the show). TLC made Jon go on every Tv tabloid giving interviews about the divorce and his new girlfriend. (I remember one interview he gave the date of the last time he and Kate had sex.) Evil TLC did all that too poor moral, righteous and protective parent, Jon Gosselin. (wipes a tear away). :)
There is no way I believe TLC paid for Kate's attorneys. Jon is crying victim again. I remember Kate giving a short interview mentioning her legal bills.
What is really sad, is that BL knows that Collin is being kept away in his best interest. For whatever reason, it's court approved and something happened to Collin that makes Jon harmful to him. There is no other reason.
Other than the little burst on Friday, none of the other tabloids seem to care what Jon has to say.
Stxmom, welcome home! Hope your DIL had a excellent time with her expert tour guides.
Jon broke his contact because TLC wouldn't let him do his own thing, like hosting parties in Las Vegas and doing a TV series with Lohan, not to mention all the press about his romantic life. I seem to recall that the Hellers were behind his extra-curricular activities and did PR for him. His contract called for him to do family-oriented things with TLC's approval and he was getting as far away from that as he could.. Interesting that he's rewritten history, isn't it?
Wow, I didn't see the SH show, but sounds like a repeated story Jon has peddled every time he needs some $. If TLC didn't pay for Kate's lawyers like Jon says, he has walked into a new can of worms with them. I don't remember Jon quitting the show, he walked out on his own agreement with TLC. A contract is a contract, and he spent the next couple of years hopping bed to bed. If Jon has a lawyer, this interview will look bad in court for him, but I have my doubts he is going to court for anything, so instead he will use his kids for his own purpose for some fast bucks. It's almost tax season, (snort).
Jon has to know why his one son has not seen him, what a liar. He wants the press to go after Kate about all of this. Wonder if his gf would like the press to go after her and her children if she has any?
Sometimes you have to break the law or an agreement for the greater good. If there is some much greater good to not paying your mortgage or if it is causing severe damage to someone, then you might consider not paying. This is what ethics is and sometimes the ethical thing wins out over black letter law.
_______________________________________________________________________________ OMG Sage! You missed the best part!
A LAWYER saying, hey, if paying your mortgage hurts, don't pay it!! LOL
Tell that to the people who are getting their homes repossessed! It's for the greater good! It's allllll ok!
Of course, when talking about Jon's women, they HAD to bring Steve into the picture. Why is it so hard to grasp that there has never been one iota of evidence that Kate and Steve were romantically involved. Another instance of telling the fabricated story so much that they believe it....
Ex-Nurse brought up a great point that all the Bl's posters ignore. They all want to believe that Jon stopped filming for the sake of the kids (ignoring the other things that Jon was doing to break his contract and that he was on a pap mania tour at the time). But, ex-nurse mentions how Jon folded in the settlement with TLC.
Bl never has a problem stating her lies about Kate as complete truths. Again, when it comes to Jon, "no one knows, so why speculate?" She's always right there to shut down any negative reaction of Jon.
Bl has no recall of Jon's settledment with TLC. She wants to deny that Jon allowed the children to be filmed. Sorry, Bl, you are wrong again. The entire family was under contract after Jon's settlement. I think it was 2 yrs later when Jon mentioned his contract was up. At the time, there was some disucssion about it at BL's.
Mark Jay Heller, Gosselin's attorney, said the settlement was filed Wednesday and Gosselin did not appear in court. He said Gosselin is hopeful that the network will move forward with the "best interests" of the family.
"Jon has expressed his desire to close the litigation chapter of 'Jon & Kate Plus 8,' he said. "Sometimes litigants that kiss and make up find their relationship is much better the second time around. As Jon's attorney, I truly hope this new adventure for TLC and the Gosselins is a much more joyful journey."
Heller did not disclose details of the agreement and would not say whether Gosselin would be allowed to appear again on the network. Asked whether the countersuit is still ongoing, he said: "All litigation has come to an end."
Goldberg, the TLC spokeswoman, said the whole Gosselin family remains under contract with the network.
"We have announced that we're working on a show with Kate," she said. "That's all that's in the works at this time."
xxxxxxx
Ex Nurse said... 127 ... As far as the greater good argument, it was widely reported that his settlement with TLC resulted in the suit being dropped in return for allowing the kids to film. So, so much for the greater good. He was apparently all about ethics when he thought had a great media future. Not so much when those opportunities evaporated. Some may not believe that, but I do. If Jon had half of the character and integrity that many here ascribe to him, the kids would be a lot better off. I wish I could see him this way, but I don't. I don't care enough about this to spend any time on research. Why he has dragged this up out of the past is beyond me. January 25, 2016 at 6:17 PM
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 162
If this is what happened, why did TLC drop the lawsuit.
&&&&
They didn't drop the lawsuit. They reached a settlement. Huge difference. For all we know the settlement was Jon agreeing not to sue them if they agree to not sue him.
I haven't the foggiest idea what the settlement said and neither does anyone else. The terms have never been disclosed. So the idea that it was widely reported he agreed to let the children be filmed doesn't make a whole lot of sense since no one has ever talked about the terms. January 25, 2016 at 10:52 PM
To make it clear for Bl minions; the TLC settlement took place when Jon still had 50/50 legal custody. His agreement was necessary for the kids to be placed under contract with evil child exploiting TLC.
Since then, Jon gave up legal custody and Kate has control. The minions who are praising St. Jon don't seem to realize Jon cut himself off from decisions and information regarding their schooling and mental/physical health. He has no rights when it comes to any of that.
I find it very interesting that in all of this revisionist history, Jon never once mentions how he intends for his children to be supported. If he had cut off TLC, was he going to, for once in his life, hold onto a job? That tidbit never seemed that interesting to him or to his worshippers.
Jon said he didn't regret the kids being on TV because they have a trust fund. He didn't say the kids were in danger and Kate is beating them.If his kids were in danger I would think he would have brought that up.
What about the fact that while he was saying filming was bad out of one side of his mouth, he was very vocal about developing a kid's line of clothing that his kids would promote, out of the other side of his mouth? These are his own words, and there was an interview at the time, with him saying them on camera too. It is not speculation; he said it, weeks after the split.
I think the reason the lawsuit was dropped with TLC is that Jon couldn't afford to proceed in court. His past flings would have been brought to the court, his broken contract and no way to support his family. Heller was a scammer in my opinion and latched on to Jon to just make a fool out of Jon and it showed. Jon paid for shady lawyers but I don't think he could get representation from a worthy law firm to help him out.
As for Kate and Steve, pfft, if there was anything there, you can bet the rags would have been all over it. Jon started the rumor to take heat off himself. He wanted for Kate to be accused of what he was doing, just like the ditch layer who he feed untruths to. Jon is bitter, a sad man who will never own up to what he did. It's everyone's fault but his. I feel sorry for his kids, he has no idea how to parent and has unhealthy relationships to stand with him and parent. What does Jon do all day, he could work a real job and DJ his couple nights a week.
For a group of people who are so convinced of their intellectual superiority to buy into the Jon Gosselin, Victim and Saint story line is just so damn funny. They are gullible fools who live in a completely black and white world where there is a directly proportional relationship between their hatred for Kate and their love for Jon.
Tucker's Mom said... 187
The sheep take the kids filming as fait accompli that Jon bargained away paying child support. Well, it just goes to their low-information nature and lack of critical thinking skills.
Of course, Kate would never, ever disabuse them of the notion.
Bl is going to do have some heavy duty spinning and twirling. The below is from Jon's instagram.
Bl's minions have blasted Kate for ignoring court orders. They've been respecting Jon for not calling the police to enforce visitation.
Isn't convenient that during the SH interview, Jon didn't stress this is the way his visitation is so ordered by the court?
http://www.instagram.com/p/BA21XJYSF3q/
metcon_incHi Jon, I just watched your interview... You stated you hadn't seen your son in over a year... You get to see all the kids but one? Can't the court order Kate to allow you to see all your kids? It saddens me that you only see four at a time. dj_jon_gosselinYou think that would be the norm, but not in this case!
Jon's response regarding the court not ordering Kate to allow Jon to see all the kids together. "You think that would be the norm, but not in this case!"
"Not in this case." What's going on with "this case?" If the court won't order Kate to allow Jon to see all the kids, isn't it just further proof that it's something about JON that is creating this circumstance? He's pleased to make himself look like some kind of poor dad who hasn't seen all his kids together in years, but if the court won't do anything to make that happen, the court must have its reasons, and those reasons aren't about Jon being a great dad who creates a great environment for his kids when he as them.
As usual Jon tells the version of events that make him look like a victim, and the person interviewing him doesn't call him on what he said and doesn't press for the whole story. Fortunately it's not very difficult to figure it out why the courts wouldn't force kids to visit their dad if they don't want to visit their dad.
It's Jon who has invited scrutiny of his situation and it's Jon who is admitting that not even going to court will result in him getting to see all his kids. The court has decided that it's up to the kids, or maybe the court has even decided that it's up to Kate, but Jon doesn't have a say, and there must be a reason for it that makes Jon look...not so great.
I would imagine that not having a large enough place for them to stay and the fact that he doesn't ever have his own place, might have something to do with it. but that's just a guess. Remember when he put them all in sleeping bags in Ellen's 2 BR apt? He seems to immediately move in with whoever his current item is.
Hoffman in an email to me said that Jon and Ellen were mean to Collin. On the other side of that it is hard to believe anything Hoffman said or has said.
OMG! The stupidity! There's no way Bl could possibly believe this or give this type of counsel. There's an easier and smarter way to quit "running back to court for every single decision because you will never agree on anything" than giving up your legal custody. Duh, You can just let the other parent decide and go along with it. You're not required to give up the legal rights to your children which cuts you off from medical information and decision making. The minions don't seem to get that Jon can't talk to teachers to find out how his kids are doing, he can't talk to their doctors, he can't put them in counseling.
A parent that has supposedly fought for custody and fought to keep their kids from filming would never be advised to give up rights. Especially, if he call the home with their mother a "house of horrors."
xxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 47
The question I have, is why would he give up legal custody?
&&&
Assuming he "chose" to give up anything, if things are as awful as he says when it comes to co-parenting, in some cases it can be best to just allow one parent to have legal custody. If you are literally running back to court for every single decision because you will never agree on anything, that can get expensive and awful on teh children.
It might have been better for the children's emotional health to stop the bickering over school, medical care, etc. That is a reasonable explanation.
I can see Jon say she's got them in a great school, I don't care much one way or the other if they go to church, and she provides them medical care more or less--enough is enough with the bickering. January 26, 2016 at 11:41 AM
Jon took all the kids to the fence for the paps to photograph, Jon knew creepy Hoffman was hanging out in the ditch watching Kate & kids, Jon did something with babysitter Stephanie inside the house (maybe that was garage apartment or somewhere else on the property), Jon's had so many different women in his life and he quickly moves in with them - these are just the things that are public knowledge. Can you blame the kids if they choose to not spend time with him?
Sage, I heard that sometime last year that it was reported that Jon and one of his girlfriends treated Collin terribly. But was it Ellen? I always thought it was Liz for some reason. If this is the case, then poor Collin. That is just horrendous for a young boy to encounter. If he ever decides to want to see Jon again, I really do hope it's one on one time at least.
Oh my. Someone is losing her shit tonight. I'd love a lawyer who actually knows something about the law to weigh in on the BL's statement that Deanna would be in jail here in LA LA land. At this point, Deanna is not violating a court order so there is absolutely nothing she is doing that would land her ass in jail.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 18
Deanna? You're ignorant. Their choice? They are being heavily influenced by their alienated mother.
In actuality, children that age are not old enough to make this decision for themselves, and are highly susceptible to a parent who has proven time and time again she cannot respect their father and his role. They are victims of Kate's alienation, period. Now, you, Deanna, are a participant in the alienation. Jon should get a fucking court order ordering YOU to STFU or go to jail for contempt.
Study some family law, talk to some family law attorneys, and grow the F up. You're 40 years old.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period.
BL and her minions have fabricated Kate's every move and every word in their demented minds. Deanna is there and knows the kids. I guess the truth is not allowed in BL's fantasy courtroom.
They are c/p Deanna's tweets at BL's and poor little Becks is losing it. ////////////////////////
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 26 That's interesting. I also have seen the parent who cares about the kids' well-being, health and education and it's not Kate. Kate's about $$$; Jon is about the kids.
&&&&&
And that's the thing, Deanna only has seen Kate's perspective. If I only heard Kate's story and never really watched the old episodes of the show or listened to Jon's side of thing with an open mind or have the background in working directly on parental alienation cases as an attorney for fathers, mothers, and children, I'd probably assume to take Kate's side too. There are two sides to every story and Deanna only commingling with Kate then professing to know who is right is disingenuous at best and certainly very ignorant.
And why is Kate discussing all this with Deanna, including that "experts" whatever that means, are involved. Is Kate in violation of a court order not to discuss what is said in family law court? Why should Deanna know what therapists or whatever experts are saying? That's strictly confidential and at least in CA the minor holds the right to that confidentiality.
Deanna conveniently leaves out the complete story and probably doesn't even know it. Maybe Jon didn't give gifts to an estranged child because he knew it would upset them or a therapist suggested it was not a good idea right now. There is at least one child who appears to have some special needs and may be much more sensitive to things like that. There are reasonable explanations for things Deanna may not be privy to just being the toady. Nor does Jon owe her, that little passive aggressive snit, an explanation for why he does anything he does. He should do something about this little rant of hers tonight.
What I do know is that even if it's all 100% true and Deanna is right, despite everything else we've seen to the contrary Jon is a terrible awful person and father, she has no right alienating the children against him. Grow the F up.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period.
????????????????????????????????????
Because doncha know only Becks and Bleeple can speak for the kids and know what they are thinking even tho they have never met them or spent time with them.
Good for Deanna for speaking up. Jon will do nothing because that will expose what a liar he is.
Deanna is simply stating what she has observed. She knows the kids. Jon goes on TV and whines about not seeing all his kids at the same time and about not seeing one of the boys for 18 months and he expects that no one is going to contradict what he says or support Kate. Deanna is wise enough to know that those haters are all bark and no bite. They can spend the next few years trying to tear her down but the truth is that they are irrelevant and Deanna knows it.
I don't know why they are claiming Deanna deleted her tweets. I just went to look and can see them all.
The minions love it when there's a gossip article about a former nanny disclosing details. They loved it when Em Tanner attacked Kate on twitter (and then Jon had to get involved for his own attention). Robert Hoffman was their knight in shining armor. He tried to destroy Kate (no anger at him for speaking for the children) and they use his book as their Kate Wiki. RH was a friend of Jon's and they put no expectations on Jon to defend Kate. They champion anyone who has a bad word for Kate. But, not one person has the right to defend Kate without becoming their target. They were already harassing Deanna. Now, they will amp it up and go for blood. All because she revealed truths about Jon. If she spoke out against Kate, they would start building a shrine.
The minions should really give up the facade about being about the kids. They are nothing but devoted fans to Jon. They are Jon's toadies.
Bl's anger towards Deanna is scary. She's so creepy in her devotion to Jon.
Admin (#67), Deanna said she talks to the kids "constantly." What 40-year-old professional would talk to 11- and 15-year-olds constantly? It's not like they're her nieces and nephews. The more she says, the weirder she sounds.
&&&&
I think that's very weird. Before she presented herself as a family friend who came out whenever she had a free weekend now and again to hang out with Kate or do makeup for an episode. She was nice to the kids and they saw her as a big sister or aunt or whatever. Fine, that's cool. In fact I didn't even really think she came out much unless she was doing makeup for something. I never got that impression.
Now by Deanna's own admission she's indicating she is a constant presence, talking to the children constantly and now about very serious issues with their father. I'm sorry, that's odd. Very odd. She is not their mother, their aunt, their therapist, or even a teacher. It's strange. Shouldn't she be dating? Hanging out with people her age on weekends? I hope there's nothing unhealthy about her interest in the children and she's just being a latch-on. It's not like TLC has never had someone on their payroll who was off. Cough.
No surprise that that blog owner would go pedo, after all, seems like she had dirty old men who posted on her fetish birth site. I question if she is in to things that people would question in her real life. She has accused everyone of this before, her posters have to have very sick minds to read this awful stuff and continue to post there. Disgusting!
Deanna has a real job, real friends, a real life and is close to Kate and her kids. The jealousy screams out of the BL, who has 12 hours a day to blog about a family that will never give her a second thought. Is the BL almost 40? Maybe she should find something of value in her life, like a bf, kids, pets, friends? I can't imagine having to listen to her drivel in real life, so I can see how many would run fast from her. Was her upbringing so bad that she might have had had serious issues within her own family for her to act out her frustrations on others? Hmmm, makes one wonder, just saying. imo
I am laughing so hard, the BL and her bogus law 101 crap. If she is such a great lawyer, most lawyers that have done great things are honored for their accomplishments in real life. Can we say LOSER here!
She is crying today for Jon telling his lies over and over again, and the public put Jon down on every post where the story ran. Chin up Becs, wipe the tears, Jon made a fool out of you again. Jon 1, Becs, 0.
Jon wouldn't spit on her, he as a real woman in his life. he says) Her stomping and yelling her rubbish is just entertaining, like reality TV. OMG, she is fun to watch when she lost her point on what was said, Jon's truth.
Leslie has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
Oh man, the fact that she deleted all the tweets knows she SCREWED UP and GOT SCARED! I love this. She is a bobble head nit. Great words for the ugly bitch. /////////////////////////////////// Wow.
Ugh, it's scary how rabid they are. Good morning! Just stopping by to say they are lying about Deanna deleting tweets. She hasn't deleted anything she tweeted last night.
Aunt Jodi and Uncle Kevin where "characers on the show." They were sainted by Bl's for "speaking for the children". Jodi gossiped on national tv that Jon told her Kate was having an affair. She said there was some secret contract that let Jon have an open marriage. They spoke at that council on child labor laws dishing about the kids and Kate. All of the haters were ecstatic and still praise those noble people who were not afraid to take a stand for the children.
Bl wants Deanna in jail. Deanna said nothing more about custody than Jon did. Even Jon has said he drops the kids off early because of his DJ gigs. The stuff about Jon not giving Christmas presents to all the kids is nothing compared to the gossip and attacks led by Jon and RH. I think it would have been better for her to keep quiet. But, it's also nice to see someone revealing the truth about Jon and standing up for Kate. I imagine these custody interviews Jon keeps doing is hard on the kids. But, that doesn't stop Jon.
The hypocrisy level is insane. Bl is off her rocker to want Deanna in jail, way out of line.
xxxxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period. January 26, 2016 at 7:12 PM
Aunt Jodi and Uncle Kevin where "characers on the show." They were sainted by Bl's for "speaking for the children". Jodi gossiped on national tv that Jon told her Kate was having an affair. She said there was some secret contract that let Jon have an open marriage. They spoke at that council on child labor laws dishing about the kids and Kate. All of the haters were ecstatic and still praise those noble people who were not afraid to take a stand for the children.
Bl wants Deanna in jail. Deanna said nothing more about custody than Jon did. Even Jon has said he drops the kids off early because of his DJ gigs. The stuff about Jon not giving Christmas presents to all the kids is nothing compared to the gossip and attacks led by Jon and RH. I think it would have been better for her to keep quiet. But, it's also nice to see someone revealing the truth about Jon and standing up for Kate. I imagine these custody interviews Jon keeps doing is hard on the kids. But, that doesn't stop Jon.
The hypocrisy level is insane. Bl is off her rocker to want Deanna in jail, way out of line.
xxxxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period. January 26, 2016 at 7:12 PM
Mel has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
Those spoiled kids are old enough to understand that it's a two way street.
You don't get Christmas gifts from someone you refuse to ever see. Entitled much?
How come their crew daddies didn't bring them a wad of gifts??
///////////////////////////////
Gee expecting Christmas gifts from your dad makes you entitled? By not getting some of the kids a gift shows what a vindictive bitter person Jon is. They all need to be away from him.
BL said: "Now by Deanna's own admission she's indicating she is a constant presence, talking to the children constantly and now about very serious issues with their father. I'm sorry, that's odd. Very odd. She is not their mother, their aunt, their therapist, or even a teacher. It's strange. Shouldn't she be dating? Hanging out with people her age on weekends? I hope there's nothing unhealthy about her interest in the children and she's just being a latch-on. It's not like TLC has never had someone on their payroll who was off. Cough."
Really, BL?
Doesn't this woman realize that this could be written about HER, except that BL doesn't even know the kids, along with not being their mother, aunt, therapist or teacher? Does BL ever think about dating, hanging out with people her own age on weekends instead of obsessively thinking about kids she doesn't even know and writing about them and wondering about them and trashing their mom while glorifying their dad?
There's plenty unhealthy about BL's obsessive interest in the Gosselin children yet she has the nerve to wonder about a friend of Kate's? It's "odd?" "Very strange?" But BL thinks that what she's been doing for years is what? Perfectly normal? Wow.
Birth fetish site showed she is not normal. Something very very off about her. She got off watching young girls giving birth....that about says it all.
They are screaming about Deanna. Below are excerpts Hoffman wrote in the preface of his book . Considering how he followed Kate and the kids, went through garbage, hid in a ditch and taunted Kate and Deanna on twitter, his creep factor is off the charts. Certainly is fixated on Little Collin.
xxxxx
My intention in writing this ‘book’ for lack of a better word was not to judge Kate Gosselin, but rather to present information that I’ve learned personally in the past several years that might hopefully, somehow help eight of the most beautiful children that I’ve ever met.
I like Jon Gosselin, a lot. He’s my friend. I like Jon Gosselin’s family as well. Hanging out with Jon is like hanging out with any of your friends. It’s relaxed and usually uneventful and we both like it that way. Except for time spent with my children, I lead a very boring life and I have fun when I’m with him. I’ve traveled with him and partied with him and have been with him through his highest highs and his lowest lows.
I’m writing this book for the Gosselin kids.
My experiences with the Gosselin children, especially Collin, are priceless to me.
But Collin is the main reason this book is being written so I will share this personal story.
One day, back in 2009, knowing how strict Kate is with the kids about them not eating anything even remotely fun, I brought them two big boxes of Dunkin Donuts. Their eyes lit up like Christmas morning and they dug into them and couldn’t eat them fast enough. (I had checked with Jon first to make sure that nobody had a peanut allergy or anything of the sort.) After a few minutes, Collin had icing all over his face and a donut in each hand and there was one left in the box and he said to me in his precious little voice, “Robert, will you hold that donut for me until I finish these two? I really want it but I can’t carry it.”
Then one of the little girls reprimanded me in a stern voice, “mommy doesn’t let us eat sweets!” and I acted surprised and said, “Oh, I’m sorry. I won’t bring anymore donuts to the house, I promise.” And she said in a quieter voice, “Oh no Robert, you bring us more donuts.”
My heart melted.
Also regarding Collin, whenever I was with the kids, or my kids were playing with them and it was time for us to go, Collin would ALWAYS make sure to come and give us big hugs and kisses and say goodbye. Always. And when I’d look back as I was walking away, he’d still be waving to us. He has so much love to give and his heart is so big.
So the reason for the book.
My professional diagnosis as a graphic designer and photographer is that Kate Gosselin is mentally ill and sick on several different levels and needs to get professional help before she seriously injures one or all of her children…or worse.
They really are the least self-aware human beings on the planet. If you want to understand the "whole sheeple psych thing," Blowing In The Wind, start by looking in a mirror and then plop yourself down on a therapist's couch.
Blowing In The Wind said... 172
They all act like they're so innocent, but they do exactly the same things they accuse the haters of.
-------------
And that's what makes this whole sheeple psych thing so darn interesting! They just don't get it, and you have to wonder why they don't. Is it brainwashing, no intelligence, lack of critical thinking, no self-awareness, or all of that?
Hmmm, strange that Jon has never mentioned Hoffie in years. I think Jon has the dirt on Hoff and when his kids are raised and safe away from the ditch layer, hopefully all will come out what really happened with Hoffie. I would fear for my kids if this loon lived with 100 miles from me. Seriously, that man has mental issues. Stalking a family even while Jon was married to Kate should have sent up a red flag for Jon, but instead Jon grabbed onto another loser, just like Heller. Cooking hotdogs on a river bank and stalking Kate and his children, Jon went along with this. Jon knew then he wanted his family back, but it was too late. My opinion.
Deny all you want, but you do the very same things the non fans do. You hate Jon. You claim to know him when you say he does things such as talking to the tabloids when Kate is on TV. You don't know that, you assume it which is what they do. There are so many examples but you have closed minds and think you're better than them. You're both certifiable, delusional nitwits, both sides. Same shit different day, for years and years. You have several who are equal to Redbird. Get a life, which is what you tell them every damn day. This blog is for slamming another blog, claiming you don't worship Kate, when you clearly do. Open your eyes!!
Anonymous, I think I have a different definition of "worship" than you do, as I don't see Kate worship here. Can you provide some examples of what you consider "worship?" I see people saying that she has the right to parent her children as she chooses (within the bounds of the law, obviously). That's not "worship."
I certainly don't worship Kate. Some of her parenting choices make me cringe a bit and I didn't think continuing to film in the midst of a nasty divorce was the best decision, but that doesn't make the woman evil. If Kate Gosselin believes that reality TV is harming her children but chooses to continue anyway, then that would make her a pretty horrible human being. I don't happen to think that's the case. I think from her perspective, the pluses outweigh the minuses. Whether or not I agree with that perspective is ultimately irrelevant, because they aren't my kids. Her life, her children, her choices. It's as simple as that.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
As for raising her children as long as it's within the bounds of the law. What a joke! By her own words in her copyrighted journal, she was brutal to her children. But that's ok, that's just fine because it was so long ago it doesn't matter. Why not ask some parents whose children have been abused if they are that quick to forgive.
Yes ma'am Sage, my eyes are wide open. It's interesting from time to time to come back and read both blogs. It's the same thing, you guys hate Jon, they hate Kate.
Anonymous, As many times as your friends on the other blog have called CPS on Kate; as many times as the Twitter haters have sent 100's of letters to any address they could find that had anything to do with Kate, I feel quite certain that if Kate was abusing her children, something would have been done about it a long time ago.
You love the fact that Hoffman wrote a book backing up all the horrid things that you and your friends have attributed to Kate from day one. I'm a senior citizen, but I remember how frazzled I could get from one child. I can't imagine having eight almost the same age. Kate has beaten herself up regularly for things she is not proud of...that's what her PRIVATE journal was about. Who was Robert Hoffman to go through garbage and share her most private thoughts? What has he accomplished except to draw his rabid haters into a frenzy. If you notice, the maintream press wouldn't touch his garbage book with a 10' pole!
Heaven forbid anyone stand up for Kate. That is not allowed in Haterland. From day one, most of the blogs that I ever knew about immediately kicked off anyone who stood up for Kate.
The purpose of this blog is not to hate Jon, but we are entitled to our opinions, just as you are entitled to yours. Jon has done nothing to warrant our support and those who hang by his every word need to do some more homework. Believe me... If Kate was keeping his children from him, he would have been in court a long time ago. There is a reason his children don't want to see him and it's not "parental alienation" ... It's because of the way HE treats his children and the life he lives.
Deanna's tweeting hit a raw nerve in many last night, because it's been a long time since someone stood up for Kate with FACTS. She is there. She knows what goes on. If you don't like what we say here, find another place to hang out, because it's not up to you to tell us what we are doing wrong. We're tired of being lectured by you.
Touched a nerve there Quiltart? I have not lectured anyone but boy you sure did. I am not a hater or a fan. I just don't believe every word out of Kate's mouth is the truth. But that doesn't mean I think Jon doesn't lie.
Same old story. Go to another blog if you don't like us. But it's fine and dandy that you go to the other blog, copy their comments and come back here to trash them.
Open your eyes, you are EXACTLY a the same, just on a different side.
Anonymous, since reasoned discussion clearly isn't your forte, I won't waste my time engaging in a back and forth with you. I'm anxiously awaiting your examples of Kate worship! Surely you are able to provide some for us poor blind folk, preferably in Braille.
Gee, I never said I hated Jon. Questioned why he runs to the tabs and sells stories, going on TV the past few days, but just last week he said on his own twitter account he would not discuss Kate or his kids. A big announcement on his twitter about a new lawyer he had. Who does this when he says he wants his kids protected? This is all public, Jon's truth that he put out himself.
I would have respect for Jon if he would step up, pay cs, quit whining and get a real job. I think Jon needs direction, he seems to float from 1 job to another, paying no mind that he even has children. He left his family, he chose his path, he needs to learn to deal with his own actions, just as Kate has learned the struggle is real. I do not agree with Kate on everything, some things have made me cringe, her family, her choice.
I don't believe for 1 minute that Jon has no idea that he does not know why his son won't see him. Jon wanted that out for a pity party and he knew he couldn't discuss the reason why. He wanted once again to blame Kate. The problem for Jon is Joe Q public has seen his actions and the comments on many articles were not kind to him. He few on twitter make Jon look even worse. How sad that they use Jon for their hate for Kate and the kids. The problem is that Jon was involved in some of this also, which they forget to add. Opinion only here.
Why do they put up with this arrogance? Even regular poster Ex-Nurse can't get a post through about Jon. She must have made too much sense, because Bl replied with one of her ghost answers. Bl is always there to defend Jon. She bashes the kids. But, any negative mention of Jon and Bl is on the spot to spoonfeed the line of thinking to her minions.
Since it's Jon, BL has "has no idea what's going on" and we all have to use our imaginations and think our very hardest to imagine a best-case scenario where Jon is in the right and being super-dad for not bestowing a Christmas present to some of of his children. While, day in and day out, they know exactly what is going on with Kate and they jump to worse case scenario their imaginations can dream up.
Bl is completely ignoring Jon's post on instagram where he said his case is not the norm regarding the court ordering Kate to allow him to see his kids. She has decided that Kate is disregarding court ordered visitation.
From Deanna's tweet, Bl also has deduced the children who did not receive gifts from their father must be the ones estranged from him. They are treating their father like dirt and are entitled brats for ignoring their father but expecting a present. It's easier for BL to blame the children for treating their father like dirt rather than Jon treating the children like dirt. The bogus theory of alienation never puts blame on the father. It's always the children or the mother.
Lick it up Bleeple, then go and spread the word! :)
xxxxxxx Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 46 I couldn't disagree more with the posters who said that any child who doesn't want to see their father should be denied gifts.
&&&&
You're mischaracterizing what we're saying. It's not that a child should be DENIED gifts, and what's more, we have no idea what's going on and whether they were "denied" anything.
But it's very dysfunctional if a child is treating Jon like dirt (because they are alienated against him, of course) but still wants gifts. It doesn't work that way and if that's how Deanna sees it, she's wrong. ... (then BL goes on to describe some case of hers which completely justifies Jon).
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 49
Question for you ex nurse, can you and Deanna envision a scenario where a therapist could feel that providing gifts to a child who is estranging you could only serve to antagonize that child further, or be mistaken as some kind of bribe and upset the child? Or wield power to that child over a parent they are not equipped to handle?
Can you envision a scenario where a good parent would make the tough decision not to send a gift? Deanna apparently can't, for all her forty years.
Jon claims that there's one child that he hasn't seen in 18 months. Deanna claims that not all the kids received gifts from Jon for Christmas. She didn't say how many kids didn't get gifts. Whatever Jon's reasons are for not giving one or more of the kids gifts at Christmas, it's Jon who has to carry on trying to have a relationship with his children. If he can look the kids that he hasn't given Christmas gifts to in the eye and think that he's being a good father then that's that, I guess. My question would be can the kids look at their dad and feel like he's a good father? Gifts they get or don't get from Jon are the least of their problems.
What I don't think that Jon's toadies or in other words the bleeple get is that by not giving all the kids Christmas presents is not about materialism. By doing that he makes the kids who got them feel guilty and the ones that didn't feel unwanted. Jon is suppose to be the adult and he is acting like a miffed child.
I CAN"T IMAGINE not giving Christmas gifts to children when you have 8 of them. Jon is punishing his own kids. How sad. Jon's family must be terrible not to help guide him when the holidays are around, or that woman who is living with him, shame on her. That's like saying Happy Birthday to a child, without at least a cake and small gift. What father would ever do this, yep, Jon does, yet he expects the courts to say he is a fit Dad. If you don't want stuff talked about Jon, don't do this kind of crap.
Family court looks at everything Becs, you don't get to dissect what you what to leave out. Your advice is basically curb side advice, just another arm chair that speaks, no value in what you say. All states are different, CA law has family court, looks up some cases and read. imo
Jon, go find that mountain, do some real soul searching and clean up your act. I think the reason you are doing this is maybe another season of Kate plus 8 is going to be filmed and you don't get a piece of the earnings.
LOL, those twitter nuts think boycotting a place like a grocery chain are going to listen to 5 nuts, they don't care. Millions shop there everyday. Seriously, people need to get a grip, volunteer with your money and bodies, not grip about Kate. It's just too funny to see them lecture a few on twitter. Walmart is open 24/7, they will leave the light on for you.
Now Jon is talking to Radaronline? I used to have some sympathy for him about some things, but no more. Thank God that most parents don't have the media to run to, but talking to friends and relatives is bad enough if kids find out about it.
Keep running your mouth, Jon. You may find yourself on your deathbed someday, wondering why all your kids are not there, and the ones who are not will probably have lifelong trust issues. Talking about them or their mother or the situation to anyone who may repeat what you say, never mind the MEDIA, is damaging to kids and is NOT protecting their little hearts. What happened to keeping your kids' lives private??
If a stranger to this situation read Deanna's tweets last night, they'd think this divorce was a recent event. But it was 6 years ago, and these feelings of anger still seem so intense. Some therapy would benefit everyone involved.
____________________________
Same goes for Jon. He gets talk shows to rehash the same old thing. He knows what the court has allowed concerning visitation. He's not telling the whole story. Jon nor Deanna should has talked about personal matters. He brought it up first.
Tucker's Mom has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
But the point is Jon did not purposely withhold presents from any of his kids to be mean. And that is strictly what Deanna wants the readers to think. She is twisting the facts. I will NEVER believe Jon withheld presents for lack of caring, spite, or to be mean. Shame on Deanna! ***** Same here. Putting it out there that Jon is such a bad dad that he didn't even give some kids Christmas presents is really dirty pool. The only thing Deanna accomplished was hurting the kids and making this whole, pathetic, sickening mess WORSE for them. /////////////////////////////////////
Jon made it worse for the kids by going on the Steve Harvey show and sharing how he doesn't see all the kids. If anyone needs to be hauled back into court it is Jon.
If Jon has so much to talk about, why didn't he show all his paperwork from the court and everyone would see who is telling the truth. Seems Jon forgets many details, 15 should be asking the same question. Um, real lawyers would demand proof. :)
I have no problem with Jon talking about his kids, but it's always in a negative way that he does. If he thinks he is hurting Kate, well, she lived her hell, got rid of him, now he is only hurting his kids. Jon is very small, in more ways than one way I heard. (snort)
Reader is so dramatic! Of course she knows nothing about the content of court orders or whether there have been visitation denials or custody revocations, but why let a little reality get in the way of drivel that she has mistaken for some profound thought?
*************************
reader said... 167 Dad has been pushed out of this child's life. Not by divorce, not by court orders, not by visitation denials or custody revocations. But by something much more devastating, much more destructive, and much more permanent. Orchestrated by someone whose actions – while remaining hidden from the public & immune from prosecution – have permitted them to inflict the most pain possible onto a loving parent by manipulating his children into believing he's not only unlikable, but despicable, worthy of abandoning. Who does she think she's fooling?
Quiltart, back in the day when I saw him doing that, I thought he probably enjoyed doing it for her, like everyone enjoys doing things for people they love. My husband likes tea at night in the winter. He will say, "Doesn't tea sound nice?" And I will make some for both of us because I like doing it for him. (Plus, he sucks at it, haha.) It makes him happy. And that makes me happy. Tonight, he handed me a little box, which was some pesto/quinoa/corn mixture that came in their box lunches that he didn't want. I was thrilled - lunch tomorrow! Those little things are what love is all about. The little things add up to big things. I think coffee in bed is a sweet gesture! Sign me up!
That story's been up at Radar for 12 hours and not a word.
Quiltart, he sure is. Forget the diamonds and pearls, just smuggle me a brownie from the buffet at your work dinner! Or bring the vegetarian leftovers. I am easy to please. I really do believe the small things are the most important ones.
I am catching up with DVR and saw this yesterday. This gentleman gets it. Seeing him describe how he met his wife made me cry. And the way he still speaks about her is incredible. Beautiful. http://www.ellentv.com/videos/0-2ltuss10/
My question would be can the kids look at their dad and feel like he's a good father? Gifts they get or don't get from Jon are the least of their problems. ~Micha
I completely agree. I think there must have been hurt feelings for Deanna to have mentioned it. But, that's small in regards to rest of the stuff their dad has put them through.
These interviews Jon keeps giving about custody and Jon's actions towards their mother has to be hard on them. It was very Charlie Sheen of Jon to go to the tabloids saying he wanted their mom to have a psych eval. Before that, Jon and RH hooking up to destroy Kate and Jon having him around the children; the kids must know how RH used them to attack their mom. Jon is reaping what he sowed. You would think Jon's Toadies would realize these interviews do nothing to help him or the kids. This is not the way to achieve visitaton. Ntm, that Jon has said his custody is not the norm in having a parent to force visitation. Bl is still ignoring that. Lol
Wow, Bl is also ignoring what Jon said to ROL? She should be having fits. Jon doesn't mention that the kids were working. He was the one working while spending time with his kids. Sounds just like what Kate says about the show. I also didn't hear him speak out against filming when he did the interview with SH. Jon said he didn't want the kids filmed during the divorce (such a lie). He didn't say he was against the show and wanted privacy forever for his children.
“The show provided a means of living in a really rewarding way,” he confessed. “I got to see my kids all the time while working.”
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
I could be wrong though. Deanna is not attractive. She's kind of pasty looking with a rabbit face.
&&&&
And she's frumpy, school marm, dressing in long skirts and other Duggar type outfits. She's a head scratcher. Any makeup artist I've ever met or seen was so hip. //////////////////////////////////////////////
Yes, lets show how adult we are and attack Deanna for her looks. I would love love to see them put pictures of themselves up. Would everyone run in horror or laugh? hmmm
WHAT? I think Deanna is very cute. I don't think she should be speaking out on behalf of anyone, but she is very attractive. There's something 'pixie-ish' about her and she looks much younger than her age too. She reminds me of the darling French girl in The Hundred Foot Journey, quite pretty in an unconventional (not fake) way. Good grief.
I watched a few clips, including the one where someone said she was using another 'useless' kitchen gadget, and made some phallic references. Well, that useless gadget is a mister, where you can make your own cooking spray instead of buying cans. There was a bottle of olive oil right next to it and she was just prepping it, to spray a pan where she was making eggs for egg sandwiches. What is wrong with that?
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
You're conveniently leaving out the fact that the OP made nasty comments about her physical appearance
&&&&&
I didn't conveniently leave out anything. You included my comment in your asshole reference, and so I was responding as to my comment. If you didn't mean to include my comment then you should have left it off. But since you did, I'm responding to that piece of it. See how that works? If the other poster wishes to address you about **her** comment she may do so, but that's between the two of you.
Speaking of convenient, you conveniently left out the context of the comments about Deanna's looks. The context was speculation that Kate conveniently has selected a friend to be her toady who is not as pretty as her or dresses as nice, Kate, and therefore, not a threat. It's been proven some insecure women will only maintain strong friendships with those less threatening than them, whether in looks or other areas. It's a relevant discussion. You may disagree with that point, but we have every right to discuss the point. Her looks were conveniently relevant to the conversation.
It's all very convenient in the end. ////////////////////////////////
Good grief! It is Kate's fault they are dissing Deanna about her looks and the way she dresses.
I saw an ad for a new TLC show called "rattles". ( I think that's what it is called) Is the BL going to go after all these couple who are putting their multiples on TV and move on from Kate? If she doesn't we will all know it was her hate for a successful Mom of 8.
Is she going to harass all these parents, their extended families, hometowns, friends, churches, business places, jobs? I await her blogging about these new families. Just saying-----.
LaLaLandNoMore has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
Another thing, TFW would have helped her own image by making sure Jon was greeted at the front door by smiling children (all 8) for the custody exchange. Poor, pitiful act only works for a short time, TFW. At least until public sees through it. Anyone who watched the old shows, caught on quickly. Keeping this wait at the gate business and not taking all of the children for visitation, makes TFW look sooooooo bad, not Jon. Now we certainly get the "Mine all mine." Applies to land and children. /////////////////////////////////////
These people need to take their hate glasses off and think....there is a reason Jon is not allowed on the property after all this time.
So do the haters really think that Kate should forget Jon's "friendship" with the man who wrote that book about her, (not to mention ALL the other things he did over the years) and just invite Jon on to the property, hey, why not into the house to sit around for a cup of coffee while the kids prepare to go off to dinner with him? Maybe Kate should have Jon come to her house so she can prepare that dinner for all of them! Wouldn't that be great? Forget about Jon trying to hurt you in the worst way he could, Kate, and embrace him and welcome him into your home! For the sake of the kids and family harmony, of course. Let bygones be bygones!
Yes, I'm quite sure that this is how stupid the bleeps wish Kate was.
You are so right Micha. Jon's Toadies (JTs) conveniently forget or somehow blame it on Kate the stuff that Jon has pulled. Aside from the saga of the stealing of the diary, Jon pulled publicity stunts such as having the then new girlfriend, Ellen at Kate's house posing and playing with the kids. Kate was away on DWTS so Jon took advantage. But JTs believe Kate should throw open the gate with open arms while Jon romps and roams on the property. He is never accountable.
Ellen was girlfriend 4 or 5? He had just gotten dumped off Morgan's Santa Barbara couch that March. Jon filed for full custody of the kids in April, appeared on Nancy Grace with his new attorney (who was a friend of Jon's late father). Just a week or so later, Jon fired his attorney saying he never ever ever agreed to filing for full custody. Yes, Jon slammed and fired the attorney who had promised Jon's dying father to help his son if needed. After that, Jon and Ellen pose happily with the kids at Kate's house while she is out of town. It's always so fun to see some unknown woman playing mom with your kids in your yard when you are out of town immediately after your ex has sneakily filee for custody. JTs rationalize this since Kate is inhuman and incapable of feeling normal human emotions such as fear, humiliation and hurt. JTs also think the kids are unscathed by this because of Jon's Super Dad powers.
By June, the kids were on sleeping bags in their dad and new girlfriend's too-small apartment. Lol, but JTs believe that Jon always put his kids first. Again, these were not the actions of man who was worried about his children being in the care of their mother. Lol, wonder if Jon still has Ellen's name tatted on his back?
TLC stinks has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
The house is in Kate's name. If Jon were to enter the property without her permission, she could claim he was trespassing. Most likely it's something they have mutually agreed to, otherwise it would be disruptive to drive the kids to a neutral spot to transfer them to the other parent. This happens often in divorces (FYI, sheeple). //////////////////////////////////
If I remember right they do that sometimes according to Hoffman who followed Kate to a meeting point and wrote how pretty she was while she was running. Creep.
Kylie has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
TLC Stinks, I agree the other blog does rag on you a lot. Just keep in mind who they love and that they are the ones who are a blog dedicated to reading every single comment here, taking it back over to their blog and dissecting it. And then they claim we have no lives. Assholes is a kind word for who and what they are. //////////////////////////////
Have to say I try to be fair and give you all a shot as dumbest comment ever. If you are feeling slighted I will try harder to find your name as I take a couple minutes to scroll through the stupidity that is 15 minutes.
So one hater complained about how some people who spotted them filming at Costco's today are deleting the pics because "Steve made them". No. They're probably deleting them because the haters on Twitter keep harassing them! DUH.
The Bleeple and the Twithaters are apoplectic that Kate got "free stuff" at Costco today and that she inconvenienced the other shoppers. Get over it folks. Celebrities get free stuff. Better warn all the mommies and daddies who are going to be on "Rattles" that they're not allowed to get free stuff... because, trust me, they will!
Mmmm... If Kate has already started filming a new season, Jon's interviews last week make more sense... He only comes out when Kate is in the public eye or she has gotten a new opportunity to work.
I don't believe Kate got anything free, maybe the samples just like everyone else does. I hope they ate their way through the store. LOL. Maybe the BL should worry about the Mom's on welfare because they have loser deadbeats that don't pay cs. Funny how she talks about all these families she helps, yet nothing is ever said about her in any law office or anything for the State of CA. She must be a pencil pusher, another lawyer charging big $ for no results for her clients, those kinds of lawyers are a dime a dozen. imo
Yep, Kate and the kids must have another season, Jon is angry because he can't EVER have a piece of the pie. Jon gives good Dad's a bad rap with what he has done. It doesn't matter what you do to make a living, rich, poor, his responsibilities should have been adjusted to pay something for his kids. He ran, owed backed cs and a tax bill, so he put himself in his own position. You can't blame Kate or the courts, he got off easy, Dad's and Mom's go to jail for not paying support. The BL should be ashamed to promote deadbeat Dad's, hope she never finds herself in that situation.
Francie, you get CAKE? I went yesterday and all I got was cheese! I have never seen cake! I feel gypped.
There's no proof that anything was free, and even if it was comped, it's just a few hundred bucks worth of food. If it was flats of Vitamix blenders, Kitchen Aid blenders, Dyson vacuum cleaners, jewelry and other expensive items they sell there, that would be different, but food? It will be consumed in short order and then guess what? They have to buy more food. Come on.
TLC stinks has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
It was commented that Jon's appearance on the Harvey show made sense because Kate was filming another season. Of course, according to sheeple logic he is jealous. I agree it was not coincidental. It's playing the media game because he also gave Radar an interview. It's what you do to get your side of the story out. He said it himself; he is frustrated and there is nothing wrong with venting your frustration when the other party keeps you in nonstop litigation over your kids.
///////////////////////////////////////
More hater logic...poor St. Jon. How is Jon in nonstop litigation from Kate? He gave up legal custody of the kids. Just think a minute and think about this...Jon states he has not seen all the kids. He states he has not seen one of the boys in a year and half. Jon has a lawyer. In all this time nothing has changed with Jon seeing the kids. If Kate were violating a court order don't you think he would have seen them by now by a court order? No court would allow Kate to refuse Jon visitation IF there were a court order in place that he see them. He doesn't and there isn't.
TLC stinks loves to respond to posts made here over at the BL's. Since this blog is unmoderated, unlike the BL's, why the need to be so passive-aggressive?
Sage, You better believe that if Kate was disobeying a court order, Jon would have hauled her into court MANY times in the past year and a half. Kate is not the one who ignores the court order... It's so obvious that those Bleeple with their superior intelligence and critical thinking just can't understand how their hero might...just might... not be the superdad they have created in their less than superior minds.
Jon is just pitiful, gawd a lazy deadbeat that wants to complain when Kate and the kids have a better life. You think he would be thankful that Kate can feed, cloth, educate and pay the bills for HIS kids, since he does nothing. Anyone can see he has low energy and his best job is complaining.
ROL pays few bucks for an article. Moves fast, forgotten, so Jon got 3 minutes. New sows are going to start, Jon is old news.
Jon KNOWS what a court order is, his mindless games are just boring. It's sad he plays alone.
Quiltart, You'd also think that with their superior critical thinking skills, they would realize that Kate is not keeping Jon in nonstop litigation because she already has what she wants. Which one of them repeatedly complains to the media about visitation and threatens legal action? Hint, bleeple: It's not Kate.
LOL, the great Hollywood expert speaks. Apparently on this no doubt Oscar-winning Chris Pine film, they let the nannies see the production budget, since she claims to know the line that her flight and accommodations were drawn from. Pretty sure that flights and hotel aren't paid out of the petty cash budget (there's this wacky category in most budgets called "travel"), but far be it from little ol' me to argue with someone who's been on set with that A lister Chris Pine.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 50 Thanks Jane. Same experience. When I was a guest on the Chris Pine film helping out with the children, I got put up in a lovely hotel next door to the director and all my meals were paid for plus we had a driver. Of course the flight and airport car was also paid for. Pulled straight from the petty cash budget.
OH, she spent time on a film set, extra or nosy? 25 dollar cat call? Babysitter that needs no help at all? Buffet lined up on a table, eat and run for most actors. Just asking. On a set, unless you are out of state, you get a trailer in the back lot. My what a resume she has. LOL.
304 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 304 of 304Jon probably just wanted attention. Much like his other interviews where he claimed he was going to file for custody.
They love that Jon has changed history. Doncha know that TLC is the evil that made him look bad. Jon stopped filming because the children were going through the divorce. TLC planted pics of Jon romping through France with Hailey, they made him sell out the twins' birthday to ET (after he stopped the filming of the show). TLC made Jon go on every Tv tabloid giving interviews about the divorce and his new girlfriend. (I remember one interview he gave the date of the last time he and Kate had sex.) Evil TLC did all that too poor moral, righteous and protective parent, Jon Gosselin. (wipes a tear away). :)
There is no way I believe TLC paid for Kate's attorneys. Jon is crying victim again. I remember Kate giving a short interview mentioning her legal bills.
What is really sad, is that BL knows that Collin is being kept away in his best interest. For whatever reason, it's court approved and something happened to Collin that makes Jon harmful to him. There is no other reason.
Other than the little burst on Friday, none of the other tabloids seem to care what Jon has to say.
Stxmom, welcome home! Hope your DIL had a excellent time with her expert tour guides.
Jon broke his contact because TLC wouldn't let him do his own thing, like hosting parties in Las Vegas and doing a TV series with Lohan, not to mention all the press about his romantic life. I seem to recall that the Hellers were behind his extra-curricular activities and did PR for him. His contract called for him to do family-oriented things with TLC's approval and he was getting as far away from that as he could.. Interesting that he's rewritten history, isn't it?
Wow, I didn't see the SH show, but sounds like a repeated story Jon has peddled every time he needs some $. If TLC didn't pay for Kate's lawyers like Jon says, he has walked into a new can of worms with them. I don't remember Jon quitting the show, he walked out on his own agreement with TLC. A contract is a contract, and he spent the next couple of years hopping bed to bed. If Jon has a lawyer, this interview will look bad in court for him, but I have my doubts he is going to court for anything, so instead he will use his kids for his own purpose for some fast bucks. It's almost tax season, (snort).
Jon has to know why his one son has not seen him, what a liar. He wants the press to go after Kate about all of this. Wonder if his gf would like the press to go after her and her children if she has any?
stxmom,
Glad your vacation was great!
I mean I have no idea what could have happened at Jon's that would make Collin not want to go back and visit him. Anybody have any idea? Poor baby.
BL said....
Sometimes you have to break the law or an agreement for the greater good. If there is some much greater good to not paying your mortgage or if it is causing severe damage to someone, then you might consider not paying. This is what ethics is and sometimes the ethical thing wins out over black letter law.
_______________________________________________________________________________
OMG Sage! You missed the best part!
A LAWYER saying, hey, if paying your mortgage hurts, don't pay it!! LOL
Tell that to the people who are getting their homes repossessed! It's for the greater good! It's allllll ok!
Of course, when talking about Jon's women, they HAD to bring Steve into the picture. Why is it so hard to grasp that there has never been one iota of evidence that Kate and Steve were romantically involved. Another instance of telling the fabricated story so much that they believe it....
Ex-Nurse brought up a great point that all the Bl's posters ignore. They all want to believe that Jon stopped filming for the sake of the kids (ignoring the other things that Jon was doing to break his contract and that he was on a pap mania tour at the time). But, ex-nurse mentions how Jon folded in the settlement with TLC.
Bl never has a problem stating her lies about Kate as complete truths. Again, when it comes to Jon, "no one knows, so why speculate?" She's always right there to shut down any negative reaction of Jon.
Bl has no recall of Jon's settledment with TLC. She wants to deny that Jon allowed the children to be filmed. Sorry, Bl, you are wrong again. The entire family was under contract after Jon's settlement. I think it was 2 yrs later when Jon mentioned his contract was up. At the time, there was some disucssion about it at BL's.
Here's a referesher for BL.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jon-gosselin-tlc-settle-suit/
Mark Jay Heller, Gosselin's attorney, said the settlement was filed Wednesday and Gosselin did not appear in court. He said Gosselin is hopeful that the network will move forward with the "best interests" of the family.
"Jon has expressed his desire to close the litigation chapter of 'Jon & Kate Plus 8,' he said. "Sometimes litigants that kiss and make up find their relationship is much better the second time around. As Jon's attorney, I truly hope this new adventure for TLC and the Gosselins is a much more joyful journey."
Heller did not disclose details of the agreement and would not say whether Gosselin would be allowed to appear again on the network. Asked whether the countersuit is still ongoing, he said: "All litigation has come to an end."
Goldberg, the TLC spokeswoman, said the whole Gosselin family remains under contract with the network.
"We have announced that we're working on a show with Kate," she said. "That's all that's in the works at this time."
xxxxxxx
Ex Nurse said... 127
... As far as the greater good argument, it was widely reported that his settlement with TLC resulted in the suit being dropped in return for allowing the kids to film. So, so much for the greater good. He was apparently all about ethics when he thought had a great media future. Not so much when those opportunities evaporated. Some may not believe that, but I do. If Jon had half of the character and integrity that many here ascribe to him, the kids would be a lot better off. I wish I could see him this way, but I don't. I don't care enough about this to spend any time on research. Why he has dragged this up out of the past is beyond me.
January 25, 2016 at 6:17 PM
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 162
If this is what happened, why did TLC drop the lawsuit.
&&&&
They didn't drop the lawsuit. They reached a settlement. Huge difference. For all we know the settlement was Jon agreeing not to sue them if they agree to not sue him.
I haven't the foggiest idea what the settlement said and neither does anyone else. The terms have never been disclosed. So the idea that it was widely reported he agreed to let the children be filmed doesn't make a whole lot of sense since no one has ever talked about the terms.
January 25, 2016 at 10:52 PM
To make it clear for Bl minions; the TLC settlement took place when Jon still had 50/50 legal custody. His agreement was necessary for the kids to be placed under contract with evil child exploiting TLC.
Since then, Jon gave up legal custody and Kate has control. The minions who are praising St. Jon don't seem to realize Jon cut himself off from decisions and information regarding their schooling and mental/physical health. He has no rights when it comes to any of that.
I find it very interesting that in all of this revisionist history, Jon never once mentions how he intends for his children to be supported. If he had cut off TLC, was he going to, for once in his life, hold onto a job? That tidbit never seemed that interesting to him or to his worshippers.
Jon said he didn't regret the kids being on TV because they have a trust fund. He didn't say the kids were in danger and Kate is beating them.If his kids were in danger I would think he would have brought that up.
What about the fact that while he was saying filming was bad out of one side of his mouth, he was very vocal about developing a kid's line of clothing that his kids would promote, out of the other side of his mouth? These are his own words, and there was an interview at the time, with him saying them on camera too. It is not speculation; he said it, weeks after the split.
http://stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com/2009/07/13/jon-gosselin-new-girlfriend-new-design-gig/?cp=12
I think the reason the lawsuit was dropped with TLC is that Jon couldn't afford to proceed in court. His past flings would have been brought to the court, his broken contract and no way to support his family. Heller was a scammer in my opinion and latched on to Jon to just make a fool out of Jon and it showed. Jon paid for shady lawyers but I don't think he could get representation from a worthy law firm to help him out.
As for Kate and Steve, pfft, if there was anything there, you can bet the rags would have been all over it. Jon started the rumor to take heat off himself. He wanted for Kate to be accused of what he was doing, just like the ditch layer who he feed untruths to. Jon is bitter, a sad man who will never own up to what he did. It's everyone's fault but his. I feel sorry for his kids, he has no idea how to parent and has unhealthy relationships to stand with him and parent. What does Jon do all day, he could work a real job and DJ his couple nights a week.
For a group of people who are so convinced of their intellectual superiority to buy into the Jon Gosselin, Victim and Saint story line is just so damn funny. They are gullible fools who live in a completely black and white world where there is a directly proportional relationship between their hatred for Kate and their love for Jon.
Tucker's Mom said... 187
The sheep take the kids filming as fait accompli that Jon bargained away paying child support. Well, it just goes to their low-information nature and lack of critical thinking skills.
Of course, Kate would never, ever disabuse them of the notion.
Bl is going to do have some heavy duty spinning and twirling. The below is from Jon's instagram.
Bl's minions have blasted Kate for ignoring court orders. They've been respecting Jon for not calling the police to enforce visitation.
Isn't convenient that during the SH interview, Jon didn't stress this is the way his visitation is so ordered by the court?
http://www.instagram.com/p/BA21XJYSF3q/
metcon_incHi Jon, I just watched your interview... You stated you hadn't seen your son in over a year... You get to see all the kids but one? Can't the court order Kate to allow you to see all your kids? It saddens me that you only see four at a time.
dj_jon_gosselinYou think that would be the norm, but not in this case!
Jon's response regarding the court not ordering Kate to allow Jon to see all the kids together. "You think that would be the norm, but not in this case!"
"Not in this case." What's going on with "this case?" If the court won't order Kate to allow Jon to see all the kids, isn't it just further proof that it's something about JON that is creating this circumstance? He's pleased to make himself look like some kind of poor dad who hasn't seen all his kids together in years, but if the court won't do anything to make that happen, the court must have its reasons, and those reasons aren't about Jon being a great dad who creates a great environment for his kids when he as them.
As usual Jon tells the version of events that make him look like a victim, and the person interviewing him doesn't call him on what he said and doesn't press for the whole story. Fortunately it's not very difficult to figure it out why the courts wouldn't force kids to visit their dad if they don't want to visit their dad.
It's Jon who has invited scrutiny of his situation and it's Jon who is admitting that not even going to court will result in him getting to see all his kids. The court has decided that it's up to the kids, or maybe the court has even decided that it's up to Kate, but Jon doesn't have a say, and there must be a reason for it that makes Jon look...not so great.
As he explained very clearly he was hoping by him going the kids would piggy back and be out too, which worked for awhile.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I didn't see Jon say that about piggybacking. I don't remember him saying that at all.She's adding to the story.
I would imagine that not having a large enough place for them to stay and the fact that he doesn't ever have his own place, might have something to do with it. but that's just a guess. Remember when he put them all in sleeping bags in Ellen's 2 BR apt? He seems to immediately move in with whoever his current item is.
Wasn't it Collin that Ellen & Jon was reported to treat like crap? If he's not seeing Jon, it's for a reason that started with Jon.
Hoffman in an email to me said that Jon and Ellen were mean to Collin. On the other side of that it is hard to believe anything Hoffman said or has said.
OMG! The stupidity! There's no way Bl could possibly believe this or give this type of counsel. There's an easier and smarter way to quit "running back to court for every single decision because you will never agree on anything" than giving up your legal custody. Duh, You can just let the other parent decide and go along with it. You're not required to give up the legal rights to your children which cuts you off from medical information and decision making. The minions don't seem to get that Jon can't talk to teachers to find out how his kids are doing, he can't talk to their doctors, he can't put them in counseling.
A parent that has supposedly fought for custody and fought to keep their kids from filming would never be advised to give up rights. Especially, if he call the home with their mother a "house of horrors."
xxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 47
The question I have, is why would he give up legal custody?
&&&
Assuming he "chose" to give up anything, if things are as awful as he says when it comes to co-parenting, in some cases it can be best to just allow one parent to have legal custody. If you are literally running back to court for every single decision because you will never agree on anything, that can get expensive and awful on teh children.
It might have been better for the children's emotional health to stop the bickering over school, medical care, etc. That is a reasonable explanation.
I can see Jon say she's got them in a great school, I don't care much one way or the other if they go to church, and she provides them medical care more or less--enough is enough with the bickering.
January 26, 2016 at 11:41 AM
Jon took all the kids to the fence for the paps to photograph, Jon knew creepy Hoffman was hanging out in the ditch watching Kate & kids, Jon did something with babysitter Stephanie inside the house (maybe that was garage apartment or somewhere else on the property), Jon's had so many different women in his life and he quickly moves in with them - these are just the things that are public knowledge. Can you blame the kids if they choose to not spend time with him?
Sage, I heard that sometime last year that it was reported that Jon and one of his girlfriends treated Collin terribly. But was it Ellen? I always thought it was Liz for some reason. If this is the case, then poor Collin. That is just horrendous for a young boy to encounter. If he ever decides to want to see Jon again, I really do hope it's one on one time at least.
Anon, I heard the same thing... but I thought it was Ellen.
Oh my. Someone is losing her shit tonight. I'd love a lawyer who actually knows something about the law to weigh in on the BL's statement that Deanna would be in jail here in LA LA land. At this point, Deanna is not violating a court order so there is absolutely nothing she is doing that would land her ass in jail.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 18
Deanna? You're ignorant. Their choice? They are being heavily influenced by their alienated mother.
In actuality, children that age are not old enough to make this decision for themselves, and are highly susceptible to a parent who has proven time and time again she cannot respect their father and his role. They are victims of Kate's alienation, period. Now, you, Deanna, are a participant in the alienation. Jon should get a fucking court order ordering YOU to STFU or go to jail for contempt.
Study some family law, talk to some family law attorneys, and grow the F up. You're 40 years old.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period.
Having said the above, I really do wish that everyone involved would refrain from discussing the kids and custody issues in public forums.
BL and her minions have fabricated Kate's every move and every word in their demented minds. Deanna is there and knows the kids. I guess the truth is not allowed in BL's fantasy courtroom.
They are c/p Deanna's tweets at BL's and poor little Becks is losing it.
////////////////////////
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 26
That's interesting. I also have seen the parent who cares about the kids' well-being, health and education and it's not Kate. Kate's about $$$; Jon is about the kids.
&&&&&
And that's the thing, Deanna only has seen Kate's perspective. If I only heard Kate's story and never really watched the old episodes of the show or listened to Jon's side of thing with an open mind or have the background in working directly on parental alienation cases as an attorney for fathers, mothers, and children, I'd probably assume to take Kate's side too. There are two sides to every story and Deanna only commingling with Kate then professing to know who is right is disingenuous at best and certainly very ignorant.
And why is Kate discussing all this with Deanna, including that "experts" whatever that means, are involved. Is Kate in violation of a court order not to discuss what is said in family law court? Why should Deanna know what therapists or whatever experts are saying? That's strictly confidential and at least in CA the minor holds the right to that confidentiality.
Deanna conveniently leaves out the complete story and probably doesn't even know it. Maybe Jon didn't give gifts to an estranged child because he knew it would upset them or a therapist suggested it was not a good idea right now. There is at least one child who appears to have some special needs and may be much more sensitive to things like that. There are reasonable explanations for things Deanna may not be privy to just being the toady. Nor does Jon owe her, that little passive aggressive snit, an explanation for why he does anything he does. He should do something about this little rant of hers tonight.
What I do know is that even if it's all 100% true and Deanna is right, despite everything else we've seen to the contrary Jon is a terrible awful person and father, she has no right alienating the children against him. Grow the F up.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period.
????????????????????????????????????
Because doncha know only Becks and Bleeple can speak for the kids and know what they are thinking even tho they have never met them or spent time with them.
Good for Deanna for speaking up. Jon will do nothing because that will expose what a liar he is.
Deanna is simply stating what she has observed. She knows the kids. Jon goes on TV and whines about not seeing all his kids at the same time and about not seeing one of the boys for 18 months and he expects that no one is going to contradict what he says or support Kate. Deanna is wise enough to know that those haters are all bark and no bite. They can spend the next few years trying to tear her down but the truth is that they are irrelevant and Deanna knows it.
What is funny is that Becks praised that Em person when she was on twitter bad mouthing Kate and praising Jon.
The way Becks went totally berserk over this makes me wonder if she doesn't have a crush on Jon. He does seem about her type.
I don't know why they are claiming Deanna deleted her tweets. I just went to look and can see them all.
The minions love it when there's a gossip article about a former nanny disclosing details. They loved it when Em Tanner attacked Kate on twitter (and then Jon had to get involved for his own attention). Robert Hoffman was their knight in shining armor. He tried to destroy Kate (no anger at him for speaking for the children) and they use his book as their Kate Wiki. RH was a friend of Jon's and they put no expectations on Jon to defend Kate. They champion anyone who has a bad word for Kate. But, not one person has the right to defend Kate without becoming their target. They were already harassing Deanna. Now, they will amp it up and go for blood. All because she revealed truths about Jon. If she spoke out against Kate, they would start building a shrine.
The minions should really give up the facade about being about the kids. They are nothing but devoted fans to Jon. They are Jon's toadies.
Bl's anger towards Deanna is scary. She's so creepy in her devotion to Jon.
Wow. The BL is now insinuating that Deanna is a pedophile. She is UNBELIEVABLE.
******************************
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 82
Admin (#67), Deanna said she talks to the kids "constantly." What 40-year-old professional would talk to 11- and 15-year-olds constantly? It's not like they're her nieces and nephews. The more she says, the weirder she sounds.
&&&&
I think that's very weird. Before she presented herself as a family friend who came out whenever she had a free weekend now and again to hang out with Kate or do makeup for an episode. She was nice to the kids and they saw her as a big sister or aunt or whatever. Fine, that's cool. In fact I didn't even really think she came out much unless she was doing makeup for something. I never got that impression.
Now by Deanna's own admission she's indicating she is a constant presence, talking to the children constantly and now about very serious issues with their father. I'm sorry, that's odd. Very odd. She is not their mother, their aunt, their therapist, or even a teacher. It's strange. Shouldn't she be dating? Hanging out with people her age on weekends? I hope there's nothing unhealthy about her interest in the children and she's just being a latch-on. It's not like TLC has never had someone on their payroll who was off. Cough.
No surprise that that blog owner would go pedo, after all, seems like she had dirty old men who posted on her fetish birth site. I question if she is in to things that people would question in her real life. She has accused everyone of this before, her posters have to have very sick minds to read this awful stuff and continue to post there. Disgusting!
Deanna has a real job, real friends, a real life and is close to Kate and her kids. The jealousy screams out of the BL, who has 12 hours a day to blog about a family that will never give her a second thought. Is the BL almost 40? Maybe she should find something of value in her life, like a bf, kids, pets, friends? I can't imagine having to listen to her drivel in real life, so I can see how many would run fast from her. Was her upbringing so bad that she might have had had serious issues within her own family for her to act out her frustrations on others? Hmmm, makes one wonder, just saying. imo
I am laughing so hard, the BL and her bogus law 101 crap. If she is such a great lawyer, most lawyers that have done great things are honored for their accomplishments in real life. Can we say LOSER here!
She is crying today for Jon telling his lies over and over again, and the public put Jon down on every post where the story ran. Chin up Becs, wipe the tears, Jon made a fool out of you again. Jon 1, Becs, 0.
Jon wouldn't spit on her, he as a real woman in his life. he says) Her stomping and yelling her rubbish is just entertaining, like reality TV. OMG, she is fun to watch when she lost her point on what was said, Jon's truth.
Leslie has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
Oh man, the fact that she deleted all the tweets knows she SCREWED UP and GOT SCARED! I love this. She is a bobble head nit. Great words for the ugly bitch.
///////////////////////////////////
Wow.
Ugh, it's scary how rabid they are.
Good morning!
Just stopping by to say they are lying about Deanna deleting tweets. She hasn't deleted anything she tweeted last night.
Aunt Jodi and Uncle Kevin where "characers on the show." They were sainted by Bl's for "speaking for the children". Jodi gossiped on national tv that Jon told her Kate was having an affair. She said there was some secret contract that let Jon have an open marriage. They spoke at that council on child labor laws dishing about the kids and Kate. All of the haters were ecstatic and still praise those noble people who were not afraid to take a stand for the children.
Bl wants Deanna in jail. Deanna said nothing more about custody than Jon did. Even Jon has said he drops the kids off early because of his DJ gigs. The stuff about Jon not giving Christmas presents to all the kids is nothing compared to the gossip and attacks led by Jon and RH. I think it would have been better for her to keep quiet. But, it's also nice to see someone revealing the truth about Jon and standing up for Kate. I imagine these custody interviews Jon keeps doing is hard on the kids. But, that doesn't stop Jon.
The hypocrisy level is insane. Bl is off her rocker to want Deanna in jail, way out of line.
xxxxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period.
January 26, 2016 at 7:12 PM
Aunt Jodi and Uncle Kevin where "characers on the show." They were sainted by Bl's for "speaking for the children". Jodi gossiped on national tv that Jon told her Kate was having an affair. She said there was some secret contract that let Jon have an open marriage. They spoke at that council on child labor laws dishing about the kids and Kate. All of the haters were ecstatic and still praise those noble people who were not afraid to take a stand for the children.
Bl wants Deanna in jail. Deanna said nothing more about custody than Jon did. Even Jon has said he drops the kids off early because of his DJ gigs. The stuff about Jon not giving Christmas presents to all the kids is nothing compared to the gossip and attacks led by Jon and RH. I think it would have been better for her to keep quiet. But, it's also nice to see someone revealing the truth about Jon and standing up for Kate. I imagine these custody interviews Jon keeps doing is hard on the kids. But, that doesn't stop Jon.
The hypocrisy level is insane. Bl is off her rocker to want Deanna in jail, way out of line.
xxxxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 21
This blog is dedicated to trashing the children's mother and you acted as the mouthpiece for the children's father for a period of time. I don't think you're in any position to proclaim the behavior of others is inappropriate.
&&&&
Bullshit. Deanna is a friend of Kate's and a "character" on the show. She is professing to speak for MINOR CHILDREN and their wishes. Fucked up, period.
That is not the same thing as public people commenting on public figures even if they have happened to met them or spoke to them. I don't consider Kate's fans alienators, including Milo, no more than I consider those who support Jon alienators. But you cross a serious line when you start speaking for the CHILDREN and consulting directly with the children on their wishes. She has no fucking business speaking directly to the children about their views about their father and then disclosing it to the public, and any judge I know would order her to stop immediately, kick her out of his courtroom and promise to hold her in contempt she ever pulls this kind of stunt again.
I guess we do things differently around here. But her ass would be in jail in my neck of the woods, period.
January 26, 2016 at 7:12 PM
They're b*tching about Deanna giving her opinion about what's going on when RH wrote a book doing the same.
Mel has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
Those spoiled kids are old enough to understand that it's a two way street.
You don't get Christmas gifts from someone you refuse to ever see. Entitled much?
How come their crew daddies didn't bring them a wad of gifts??
///////////////////////////////
Gee expecting Christmas gifts from your dad makes you entitled? By not getting some of the kids a gift shows what a vindictive bitter person Jon is. They all need to be away from him.
BL said: "Now by Deanna's own admission she's indicating she is a constant presence, talking to the children constantly and now about very serious issues with their father. I'm sorry, that's odd. Very odd. She is not their mother, their aunt, their therapist, or even a teacher. It's strange. Shouldn't she be dating? Hanging out with people her age on weekends? I hope there's nothing unhealthy about her interest in the children and she's just being a latch-on. It's not like TLC has never had someone on their payroll who was off. Cough."
Really, BL?
Doesn't this woman realize that this could be written about HER, except that BL doesn't even know the kids, along with not being their mother, aunt, therapist or teacher? Does BL ever think about dating, hanging out with people her own age on weekends instead of obsessively thinking about kids she doesn't even know and writing about them and wondering about them and trashing their mom while glorifying their dad?
There's plenty unhealthy about BL's obsessive interest in the Gosselin children yet she has the nerve to wonder about a friend of Kate's? It's "odd?" "Very strange?" But BL thinks that what she's been doing for years is what? Perfectly normal? Wow.
Birth fetish site showed she is not normal. Something very very off about her. She got off watching young girls giving birth....that about says it all.
They are screaming about Deanna. Below are excerpts Hoffman wrote in the preface of his book . Considering how he followed Kate and the kids, went through garbage, hid in a ditch and taunted Kate and Deanna on twitter, his creep factor is off the charts. Certainly is fixated on Little Collin.
xxxxx
My intention in writing this ‘book’ for lack of a better word was not to judge Kate Gosselin, but rather to present information that I’ve learned personally in the past several years that might hopefully, somehow help eight of the most beautiful children that I’ve ever met.
I like Jon Gosselin, a lot. He’s my friend. I like Jon Gosselin’s family as well. Hanging out with Jon is like hanging out with any of your friends. It’s relaxed and usually uneventful and we both like it that way. Except for time spent with my children, I lead a very boring life and I have fun when I’m with him. I’ve traveled with him and partied with him and have been with him through his highest highs and his lowest lows.
I’m writing this book for the Gosselin kids.
My experiences with the Gosselin children, especially Collin, are priceless to me.
But Collin is the main reason this book is being written so I will share this personal story.
One day, back in 2009, knowing how strict Kate is with the kids about them not eating anything even remotely fun, I brought them two big boxes of Dunkin Donuts. Their eyes lit up like Christmas morning and they dug into them and couldn’t eat them fast enough. (I had checked with Jon first to make sure that nobody had a peanut allergy or anything of the sort.) After a few minutes, Collin had icing all over his face and a donut in each hand and there was one left in the box and he said to me in his precious little voice, “Robert, will you hold that donut for me until I finish these two? I really want it but I can’t carry it.”
Then one of the little girls reprimanded me in a stern voice, “mommy doesn’t let us eat sweets!” and I acted surprised and said, “Oh, I’m sorry. I won’t bring anymore donuts to the house, I promise.” And she said in a quieter voice, “Oh no Robert, you bring us more donuts.”
My heart melted.
Also regarding Collin, whenever I was with the kids, or my kids were playing with them and it was time for us to go, Collin would ALWAYS make sure to come and give us big hugs and kisses and say goodbye. Always. And when I’d look back as I was walking away, he’d still be waving to us. He has so much love to give and his heart is so big.
So the reason for the book.
My professional diagnosis as a graphic designer and photographer is that Kate Gosselin is mentally ill and sick on several different levels and needs to get professional help before she seriously injures one or all of her children…or worse.
They really are the least self-aware human beings on the planet. If you want to understand the "whole sheeple psych thing," Blowing In The Wind, start by looking in a mirror and then plop yourself down on a therapist's couch.
Blowing In The Wind said... 172
They all act like they're so innocent, but they do exactly the same things they accuse the haters of.
-------------
And that's what makes this whole sheeple psych thing so darn interesting! They just don't get it, and you have to wonder why they don't. Is it brainwashing, no intelligence, lack of critical thinking, no self-awareness, or all of that?
Hmmm, strange that Jon has never mentioned Hoffie in years. I think Jon has the dirt on Hoff and when his kids are raised and safe away from the ditch layer, hopefully all will come out what really happened with Hoffie. I would fear for my kids if this loon lived with 100 miles from me. Seriously, that man has mental issues. Stalking a family even while Jon was married to Kate should have sent up a red flag for Jon, but instead Jon grabbed onto another loser, just like Heller. Cooking hotdogs on a river bank and stalking Kate and his children, Jon went along with this. Jon knew then he wanted his family back, but it was too late. My opinion.
Deny all you want, but you do the very same things the non fans do. You hate Jon. You claim to know him when you say he does things such as talking to the tabloids when Kate is on TV. You don't know that, you assume it which is what they do. There are so many examples but you have closed minds and think you're better than them. You're both certifiable, delusional nitwits, both sides. Same shit different day, for years and years. You have several who are equal to Redbird. Get a life, which is what you tell them every damn day. This blog is for slamming another blog, claiming you don't worship Kate, when you clearly do. Open your eyes!!
Anonymous, you are making many assumptions. My eyes have always been open are yours?
One example of how we are different is you posted here without moderation and unlike Becks I will not lecture you.
Have a good day!
Anonymous, I think I have a different definition of "worship" than you do, as I don't see Kate worship here. Can you provide some examples of what you consider "worship?" I see people saying that she has the right to parent her children as she chooses (within the bounds of the law, obviously). That's not "worship."
I certainly don't worship Kate. Some of her parenting choices make me cringe a bit and I didn't think continuing to film in the midst of a nasty divorce was the best decision, but that doesn't make the woman evil. If Kate Gosselin believes that reality TV is harming her children but chooses to continue anyway, then that would make her a pretty horrible human being. I don't happen to think that's the case. I think from her perspective, the pluses outweigh the minuses. Whether or not I agree with that perspective is ultimately irrelevant, because they aren't my kids. Her life, her children, her choices. It's as simple as that.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
As for raising her children as long as it's within the bounds of the law. What a joke! By her own words in her copyrighted journal, she was brutal to her children. But that's ok, that's just fine because it was so long ago it doesn't matter. Why not ask some parents whose children have been abused if they are that quick to forgive.
Yes ma'am Sage, my eyes are wide open. It's interesting from time to time to come back and read both blogs. It's the same thing, you guys hate Jon, they hate Kate.
I had a great day, thank you so much!
Anonymous, As many times as your friends on the other blog have called CPS on Kate; as many times as the Twitter haters have sent 100's of letters to any address they could find that had anything to do with Kate, I feel quite certain that if Kate was abusing her children, something would have been done about it a long time ago.
You love the fact that Hoffman wrote a book backing up all the horrid things that you and your friends have attributed to Kate from day one. I'm a senior citizen, but I remember how frazzled I could get from one child. I can't imagine having eight almost the same age. Kate has beaten herself up regularly for things she is not proud of...that's what her PRIVATE journal was about. Who was Robert Hoffman to go through garbage and share her most private thoughts? What has he accomplished except to draw his rabid haters into a frenzy. If you notice, the maintream press wouldn't touch his garbage book with a 10' pole!
Heaven forbid anyone stand up for Kate. That is not allowed in Haterland. From day one, most of the blogs that I ever knew about immediately kicked off anyone who stood up for Kate.
The purpose of this blog is not to hate Jon, but we are entitled to our opinions, just as you are entitled to yours. Jon has done nothing to warrant our support and those who hang by his every word need to do some more homework. Believe me... If Kate was keeping his children from him, he would have been in court a long time ago. There is a reason his children don't want to see him and it's not "parental alienation" ... It's because of the way HE treats his children and the life he lives.
Deanna's tweeting hit a raw nerve in many last night, because it's been a long time since someone stood up for Kate with FACTS. She is there. She knows what goes on.
If you don't like what we say here, find another place to hang out, because it's not up to you to tell us what we are doing wrong. We're tired of being lectured by you.
Touched a nerve there Quiltart? I have not lectured anyone but boy you sure did. I am not a hater or a fan. I just don't believe every word out of Kate's mouth is the truth. But that doesn't mean I think Jon doesn't lie.
Same old story. Go to another blog if you don't like us. But it's fine and dandy that you go to the other blog, copy their comments and come back here to trash them.
Open your eyes, you are EXACTLY a the same, just on a different side.
Anon, you sound stressed...take a deep breath.
LOL. Anon's mantra sounds like an old poem:
Same song,
Second verse.
Could be better
But it's gonna be worse!
Anonymous, since reasoned discussion clearly isn't your forte, I won't waste my time engaging in a back and forth with you. I'm anxiously awaiting your examples of Kate worship! Surely you are able to provide some for us poor blind folk, preferably in Braille.
Gee, I never said I hated Jon. Questioned why he runs to the tabs and sells stories, going on TV the past few days, but just last week he said on his own twitter account he would not discuss Kate or his kids. A big announcement on his twitter about a new lawyer he had. Who does this when he says he wants his kids protected? This is all public, Jon's truth that he put out himself.
I would have respect for Jon if he would step up, pay cs, quit whining and get a real job. I think Jon needs direction, he seems to float from 1 job to another, paying no mind that he even has children. He left his family, he chose his path, he needs to learn to deal with his own actions, just as Kate has learned the struggle is real. I do not agree with Kate on everything, some things have made me cringe, her family, her choice.
I don't believe for 1 minute that Jon has no idea that he does not know why his son won't see him. Jon wanted that out for a pity party and he knew he couldn't discuss the reason why. He wanted once again to blame Kate. The problem for Jon is Joe Q public has seen his actions and the comments on many articles were not kind to him. He few on twitter make Jon look even worse. How sad that they use Jon for their hate for Kate and the kids. The problem is that Jon was involved in some of this also, which they forget to add. Opinion only here.
Why do they put up with this arrogance? Even regular poster Ex-Nurse can't get a post through about Jon. She must have made too much sense, because Bl replied with one of her ghost answers. Bl is always there to defend Jon. She bashes the kids. But, any negative mention of Jon and Bl is on the spot to spoonfeed the line of thinking to her minions.
Since it's Jon, BL has "has no idea what's going on" and we all have to use our imaginations and think our very hardest to imagine a best-case scenario where Jon is in the right and being super-dad for not bestowing a Christmas present to some of of his children. While, day in and day out, they know exactly what is going on with Kate and they jump to worse case scenario their imaginations can dream up.
Bl is completely ignoring Jon's post on instagram where he said his case is not the norm regarding the court ordering Kate to allow him to see his kids. She has decided that Kate is disregarding court ordered visitation.
From Deanna's tweet, Bl also has deduced the children who did not receive gifts from their father must be the ones estranged from him. They are treating their father like dirt and are entitled brats for ignoring their father but expecting a present.
It's easier for BL to blame the children for treating their father like dirt rather than Jon treating the children like dirt. The bogus theory of alienation never puts blame on the father. It's always the children or the mother.
Lick it up Bleeple, then go and spread the word! :)
xxxxxxx
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 46
I couldn't disagree more with the posters who said that any child who doesn't want to see their father should be denied gifts.
&&&&
You're mischaracterizing what we're saying. It's not that a child should be DENIED gifts, and what's more, we have no idea what's going on and whether they were "denied" anything.
But it's very dysfunctional if a child is treating Jon like dirt (because they are alienated against him, of course) but still wants gifts. It doesn't work that way and if that's how Deanna sees it, she's wrong. ... (then BL goes on to describe some case of hers which completely justifies Jon).
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 49
Question for you ex nurse, can you and Deanna envision a scenario where a therapist could feel that providing gifts to a child who is estranging you could only serve to antagonize that child further, or be mistaken as some kind of bribe and upset the child? Or wield power to that child over a parent they are not equipped to handle?
Can you envision a scenario where a good parent would make the tough decision not to send a gift? Deanna apparently can't, for all her forty years.
Jon claims that there's one child that he hasn't seen in 18 months. Deanna claims that not all the kids received gifts from Jon for Christmas. She didn't say how many kids didn't get gifts. Whatever Jon's reasons are for not giving one or more of the kids gifts at Christmas, it's Jon who has to carry on trying to have a relationship with his children. If he can look the kids that he hasn't given Christmas gifts to in the eye and think that he's being a good father then that's that, I guess. My question would be can the kids look at their dad and feel like he's a good father? Gifts they get or don't get from Jon are the least of their problems.
What I don't think that Jon's toadies or in other words the bleeple get is that by not giving all the kids Christmas presents is not about materialism. By doing that he makes the kids who got them feel guilty and the ones that didn't feel unwanted. Jon is suppose to be the adult and he is acting like a miffed child.
I CAN"T IMAGINE not giving Christmas gifts to children when you have 8 of them. Jon is punishing his own kids. How sad. Jon's family must be terrible not to help guide him when the holidays are around, or that woman who is living with him, shame on her. That's like saying Happy Birthday to a child, without at least a cake and small gift. What father would ever do this, yep, Jon does, yet he expects the courts to say he is a fit Dad. If you don't want stuff talked about Jon, don't do this kind of crap.
Family court looks at everything Becs, you don't get to dissect what you what to leave out. Your advice is basically curb side advice, just another arm chair that speaks, no value in what you say. All states are different, CA law has family court, looks up some cases and read. imo
Jon, go find that mountain, do some real soul searching and clean up your act. I think the reason you are doing this is maybe another season of Kate plus 8 is going to be filmed and you don't get a piece of the earnings.
LOL, those twitter nuts think boycotting a place like a grocery chain are going to listen to 5 nuts, they don't care. Millions shop there everyday. Seriously, people need to get a grip, volunteer with your money and bodies, not grip about Kate. It's just too funny to see them lecture a few on twitter. Walmart is open 24/7, they will leave the light on for you.
Now Jon is talking to Radaronline? I used to have some sympathy for him about some things, but no more. Thank God that most parents don't have the media to run to, but talking to friends and relatives is bad enough if kids find out about it.
Keep running your mouth, Jon. You may find yourself on your deathbed someday, wondering why all your kids are not there, and the ones who are not will probably have lifelong trust issues. Talking about them or their mother or the situation to anyone who may repeat what you say, never mind the MEDIA, is damaging to kids and is NOT protecting their little hearts. What happened to keeping your kids' lives private??
If Kate isn't following the custody schedule the court ordered Jon would have better luck going to court instead of a talk show.
FlimsyFlamsy said... 14
If a stranger to this situation read Deanna's tweets last night, they'd think this divorce was a recent event. But it was 6 years ago, and these feelings of anger still seem so intense. Some therapy would benefit everyone involved.
____________________________
Same goes for Jon. He gets talk shows to rehash the same old thing. He knows what the court has allowed concerning visitation. He's not telling the whole story. Jon nor Deanna should has talked about personal matters. He brought it up first.
IMO Jon was acting like a kid by only giving certain ones Xmas gifts. You don't want to visit me, I'll show you! No gift for you.
See what I did there? I posted like I was @ 15mins. I KNOW what's going on! lol
Tucker's Mom has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
But the point is Jon did not purposely withhold presents from any of his kids to be mean. And that is strictly what Deanna wants the readers to think. She is twisting the facts. I will NEVER believe Jon withheld presents for lack of caring, spite, or to be mean. Shame on Deanna!
*****
Same here.
Putting it out there that Jon is such a bad dad that he didn't even give some kids Christmas presents is really dirty pool.
The only thing Deanna accomplished was hurting the kids and making this whole, pathetic, sickening mess WORSE for them.
/////////////////////////////////////
Jon made it worse for the kids by going on the Steve Harvey show and sharing how he doesn't see all the kids. If anyone needs to be hauled back into court it is Jon.
If Jon has so much to talk about, why didn't he show all his paperwork from the court and everyone would see who is telling the truth. Seems Jon forgets many details, 15 should be asking the same question.
Um, real lawyers would demand proof. :)
I have no problem with Jon talking about his kids, but it's always in a negative way that he does. If he thinks he is hurting Kate, well, she lived her hell, got rid of him, now he is only hurting his kids. Jon is very small, in more ways than one way I heard. (snort)
Farkle, nobody at 15 is saying a thing about this latest interview. I had to check. LOL
PJ, Instead they are dredging up how Jon served Kate coffee in bed.... 11 years ago!
They are stuck in a cement time warp.
Reader is so dramatic! Of course she knows nothing about the content of court orders or whether there have been visitation denials or custody revocations, but why let a little reality get in the way of drivel that she has mistaken for some profound thought?
*************************
reader said... 167
Dad has been pushed out of this child's life. Not by divorce, not by court orders, not by visitation denials or custody revocations. But by something much more devastating, much more destructive, and much more permanent. Orchestrated by someone whose actions – while remaining hidden from the public & immune from prosecution – have permitted them to inflict the most pain possible onto a loving parent by manipulating his children into believing he's not only unlikable, but despicable, worthy of abandoning.
Who does she think she's fooling?
Quiltart, back in the day when I saw him doing that, I thought he probably enjoyed doing it for her, like everyone enjoys doing things for people they love. My husband likes tea at night in the winter. He will say, "Doesn't tea sound nice?" And I will make some for both of us because I like doing it for him. (Plus, he sucks at it, haha.) It makes him happy. And that makes me happy. Tonight, he handed me a little box, which was some pesto/quinoa/corn mixture that came in their box lunches that he didn't want. I was thrilled - lunch tomorrow! Those little things are what love is all about. The little things add up to big things. I think coffee in bed is a sweet gesture! Sign me up!
That story's been up at Radar for 12 hours and not a word.
PJ, Your DH sounds like a great guy!
Quiltart, he sure is. Forget the diamonds and pearls, just smuggle me a brownie from the buffet at your work dinner! Or bring the vegetarian leftovers. I am easy to please. I really do believe the small things are the most important ones.
I am catching up with DVR and saw this yesterday. This gentleman gets it. Seeing him describe how he met his wife made me cry. And the way he still speaks about her is incredible. Beautiful. http://www.ellentv.com/videos/0-2ltuss10/
PJ.
Jon throws it out, a few gobble on it for days, and days and days, he hides, and in a couple of months when he needs $, he will be back.
Tea for Two, how nice!
My question would be can the kids look at their dad and feel like he's a good father? Gifts they get or don't get from Jon are the least of their problems. ~Micha
I completely agree. I think there must have been hurt feelings for Deanna to have mentioned it. But, that's small in regards to rest of the stuff their dad has put them through.
These interviews Jon keeps giving about custody and Jon's actions towards their mother has to be hard on them. It was very Charlie Sheen of Jon to go to the tabloids saying he wanted their mom to have a psych eval. Before that, Jon and RH hooking up to destroy Kate and Jon having him around the children; the kids must know how RH used them to attack their mom. Jon is reaping what he sowed. You would think Jon's Toadies would realize these interviews do nothing to help him or the kids. This is not the way to achieve visitaton. Ntm, that Jon has said his custody is not the norm in having a parent to force visitation. Bl is still ignoring that. Lol
Wow, Bl is also ignoring what Jon said to ROL? She should be having fits. Jon doesn't mention that the kids were working. He was the one working while spending time with his kids. Sounds just like what Kate says about the show. I also didn't hear him speak out against filming when he did the interview with SH. Jon said he didn't want the kids filmed during the divorce (such a lie). He didn't say he was against the show and wanted privacy forever for his children.
“The show provided a means of living in a really rewarding way,” he confessed. “I got to see my kids all the time while working.”
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
I could be wrong though. Deanna is not attractive. She's kind of pasty looking with a rabbit face.
&&&&
And she's frumpy, school marm, dressing in long skirts and other Duggar type outfits. She's a head scratcher. Any makeup artist I've ever met or seen was so hip.
//////////////////////////////////////////////
Yes, lets show how adult we are and attack Deanna for her looks. I would love love to see them put pictures of themselves up. Would everyone run in horror or laugh? hmmm
WHAT? I think Deanna is very cute. I don't think she should be speaking out on behalf of anyone, but she is very attractive. There's something 'pixie-ish' about her and she looks much younger than her age too. She reminds me of the darling French girl in The Hundred Foot Journey, quite pretty in an unconventional (not fake) way. Good grief.
I watched a few clips, including the one where someone said she was using another 'useless' kitchen gadget, and made some phallic references. Well, that useless gadget is a mister, where you can make your own cooking spray instead of buying cans. There was a bottle of olive oil right next to it and she was just prepping it, to spray a pan where she was making eggs for egg sandwiches. What is wrong with that?
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
You're conveniently leaving out the fact that the OP made nasty comments about her physical appearance
&&&&&
I didn't conveniently leave out anything. You included my comment in your asshole reference, and so I was responding as to my comment. If you didn't mean to include my comment then you should have left it off. But since you did, I'm responding to that piece of it. See how that works? If the other poster wishes to address you about **her** comment she may do so, but that's between the two of you.
Speaking of convenient, you conveniently left out the context of the comments about Deanna's looks. The context was speculation that Kate conveniently has selected a friend to be her toady who is not as pretty as her or dresses as nice, Kate, and therefore, not a threat. It's been proven some insecure women will only maintain strong friendships with those less threatening than them, whether in looks or other areas. It's a relevant discussion. You may disagree with that point, but we have every right to discuss the point. Her looks were conveniently relevant to the conversation.
It's all very convenient in the end.
////////////////////////////////
Good grief! It is Kate's fault they are dissing Deanna about her looks and the way she dresses.
I saw an ad for a new TLC show called "rattles". ( I think that's what it is called) Is the BL going to go after all these couple who are putting their multiples on TV and move on from Kate? If she doesn't we will all know it was her hate for a successful Mom of 8.
Is she going to harass all these parents, their extended families, hometowns, friends, churches, business places, jobs? I await her blogging about these new families. Just saying-----.
Redbird is so damn weird... She came up with a "song" about what happened with Deanna and the haters. On a scale from one to wood, how bored are you?
LaLaLandNoMore has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
Another thing, TFW would have helped her own image by making sure Jon was greeted at the front door by smiling children (all 8) for the custody exchange. Poor, pitiful act only works for a short time, TFW. At least until public sees through it. Anyone who watched the old shows, caught on quickly. Keeping this wait at the gate business and not taking all of the children for visitation, makes TFW look sooooooo bad, not Jon. Now we certainly get the "Mine all mine." Applies to land and children.
/////////////////////////////////////
These people need to take their hate glasses off and think....there is a reason Jon is not allowed on the property after all this time.
So do the haters really think that Kate should forget Jon's "friendship" with the man who wrote that book about her, (not to mention ALL the other things he did over the years) and just invite Jon on to the property, hey, why not into the house to sit around for a cup of coffee while the kids prepare to go off to dinner with him? Maybe Kate should have Jon come to her house so she can prepare that dinner for all of them! Wouldn't that be great? Forget about Jon trying to hurt you in the worst way he could, Kate, and embrace him and welcome him into your home! For the sake of the kids and family harmony, of course. Let bygones be bygones!
Yes, I'm quite sure that this is how stupid the bleeps wish Kate was.
You are so right Micha. Jon's Toadies (JTs) conveniently forget or somehow blame it on Kate the stuff that Jon has pulled. Aside from the saga of the stealing of the diary, Jon pulled publicity stunts such as having the then new girlfriend, Ellen at Kate's house posing and playing with the kids. Kate was away on DWTS so Jon took advantage. But JTs believe Kate should throw open the gate with open arms while Jon romps and roams on the property. He is never accountable.
Ellen was girlfriend 4 or 5? He had just gotten dumped off Morgan's Santa Barbara couch that March. Jon filed for full custody of the kids in April, appeared on Nancy Grace with his new attorney (who was a friend of Jon's late father). Just a week or so later, Jon fired his attorney saying he never ever ever agreed to filing for full custody. Yes, Jon slammed and fired the attorney who had promised Jon's dying father to help his son if needed. After that, Jon and Ellen pose happily with the kids at Kate's house while she is out of town. It's always so fun to see some unknown woman playing mom with your kids in your yard when you are out of town immediately after your ex has sneakily filee for custody. JTs rationalize this since Kate is inhuman and incapable of feeling normal human emotions such as fear, humiliation and hurt. JTs also think the kids are unscathed by this because of Jon's Super Dad powers.
By June, the kids were on sleeping bags in their dad and new girlfriend's too-small apartment. Lol, but JTs believe that Jon always put his kids first. Again, these were not the actions of man who was worried about his children being in the care of their mother. Lol, wonder if Jon still has Ellen's name tatted on his back?
TLC stinks has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
The house is in Kate's name. If Jon were to enter the property without her permission, she could claim he was trespassing. Most likely it's something they have mutually agreed to, otherwise it would be disruptive to drive the kids to a neutral spot to transfer them to the other parent. This happens often in divorces (FYI, sheeple).
//////////////////////////////////
If I remember right they do that sometimes according to Hoffman who followed Kate to a meeting point and wrote how pretty she was while she was running. Creep.
Kylie has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
TLC Stinks, I agree the other blog does rag on you a lot. Just keep in mind who they love and that they are the ones who are a blog dedicated to reading every single comment here, taking it back over to their blog and dissecting it. And then they claim we have no lives. Assholes is a kind word for who and what they are.
//////////////////////////////
Have to say I try to be fair and give you all a shot as dumbest comment ever. If you are feeling slighted I will try harder to find your name as I take a couple minutes to scroll through the stupidity that is 15 minutes.
So based on tweets on twitter, it looks like Kate and the kiddies are going to be filming more specials! Excited to see more of them <3
So one hater complained about how some people who spotted them filming at Costco's today are deleting the pics because "Steve made them". No. They're probably deleting them because the haters on Twitter keep harassing them! DUH.
The Bleeple and the Twithaters are apoplectic that Kate got "free stuff" at Costco today and that she inconvenienced the other shoppers. Get over it folks. Celebrities get free stuff. Better warn all the mommies and daddies who are going to be on "Rattles" that they're not allowed to get free stuff... because, trust me, they will!
You're right Quiltart ALL celebrities get free stuff and some are a lot wealthier than Kate. I can't get over the hate and jealousy they spew.
They absolutely seethe with jealousy... all of 'em...
I get free stuff from Costco all the time. The little bites of cake are my favorite!
Mmmm... If Kate has already started filming a new season, Jon's interviews last week make more sense... He only comes out when Kate is in the public eye or she has gotten a new opportunity to work.
I don't believe Kate got anything free, maybe the samples just like everyone else does. I hope they ate their way through the store. LOL. Maybe the BL should worry about the Mom's on welfare because they have loser deadbeats that don't pay cs. Funny how she talks about all these families she helps, yet nothing is ever said about her in any law office or anything for the State of CA. She must be a pencil pusher, another lawyer charging big $ for no results for her clients, those kinds of lawyers are a dime a dozen. imo
Yep, Kate and the kids must have another season, Jon is angry because he can't EVER have a piece of the pie. Jon gives good Dad's a bad rap with what he has done. It doesn't matter what you do to make a living, rich, poor, his responsibilities should have been adjusted to pay something for his kids. He ran, owed backed cs and a tax bill, so he put himself in his own position. You can't blame Kate or the courts, he got off easy, Dad's and Mom's go to jail for not paying support. The BL should be ashamed to promote deadbeat Dad's, hope she never finds herself in that situation.
Francie, you get CAKE? I went yesterday and all I got was cheese! I have never seen cake! I feel gypped.
There's no proof that anything was free, and even if it was comped, it's just a few hundred bucks worth of food. If it was flats of Vitamix blenders, Kitchen Aid blenders, Dyson vacuum cleaners, jewelry and other expensive items they sell there, that would be different, but food? It will be consumed in short order and then guess what? They have to buy more food. Come on.
TLC stinks has left a new comment on the post "Discussion Thread: Kate Plus 8 "Kate's Advice"":
It was commented that Jon's appearance on the Harvey show made sense because Kate was filming another season. Of course, according to sheeple logic he is jealous. I agree it was not coincidental. It's playing the media game because he also gave Radar an interview. It's what you do to get your side of the story out. He said it himself; he is frustrated and there is nothing wrong with venting your frustration when the other party keeps you in nonstop litigation over your kids.
///////////////////////////////////////
More hater logic...poor St. Jon. How is Jon in nonstop litigation from Kate? He gave up legal custody of the kids. Just think a minute and think about this...Jon states he has not seen all the kids. He states he has not seen one of the boys in a year and half. Jon has a lawyer. In all this time nothing has changed with Jon seeing the kids. If Kate were violating a court order don't you think he would have seen them by now by a court order? No court would allow Kate to refuse Jon visitation IF there were a court order in place that he see them. He doesn't and there isn't.
TLC stinks loves to respond to posts made here over at the BL's. Since this blog is unmoderated, unlike the BL's, why the need to be so passive-aggressive?
Sage, You better believe that if Kate was disobeying a court order, Jon would have hauled her into court MANY times in the past year and a half. Kate is not the one who ignores the court order... It's so obvious that those Bleeple with their superior intelligence and critical thinking just can't understand how their hero might...just might... not be the superdad they have created in their less than superior minds.
Jon is just pitiful, gawd a lazy deadbeat that wants to complain when Kate and the kids have a better life. You think he would be thankful that Kate can feed, cloth, educate and pay the bills for HIS kids, since he does nothing. Anyone can see he has low energy and his best job is complaining.
ROL pays few bucks for an article. Moves fast, forgotten, so Jon got 3 minutes. New sows are going to start, Jon is old news.
Jon KNOWS what a court order is, his mindless games are just boring. It's sad he plays alone.
shows, typo
Quiltart, You'd also think that with their superior critical thinking skills, they would realize that Kate is not keeping Jon in nonstop litigation because she already has what she wants. Which one of them repeatedly complains to the media about visitation and threatens legal action? Hint, bleeple: It's not Kate.
LOL, the great Hollywood expert speaks. Apparently on this no doubt Oscar-winning Chris Pine film, they let the nannies see the production budget, since she claims to know the line that her flight and accommodations were drawn from. Pretty sure that flights and hotel aren't paid out of the petty cash budget (there's this wacky category in most budgets called "travel"), but far be it from little ol' me to argue with someone who's been on set with that A lister Chris Pine.
Realitytvkids.com ~ Administrator said... 50
Thanks Jane.
Same experience. When I was a guest on the Chris Pine film helping out with the children, I got put up in a lovely hotel next door to the director and all my meals were paid for plus we had a driver. Of course the flight and airport car was also paid for. Pulled straight from the petty cash budget.
Nameless, Becks makes such a fool of herself....the bleeps just lick it up.
OH, she spent time on a film set, extra or nosy? 25 dollar cat call? Babysitter that needs no help at all? Buffet lined up on a table, eat and run for most actors. Just asking. On a set, unless you are out of state, you get a trailer in the back lot. My what a resume she has. LOL.
Post a Comment