Monday, April 14, 2014

Our Idol, Queen Kate, Still in Contention on CA



I recently read somewhere...scratching head, can't remember... that we are mostly over 50 years old here (50 is way in my rearview mirror) and we sit around all day idolizing Kate. So, I was thinking of renaming the blog...'Geezers Idolizing Kate'. What do you think? ;)



Open discussion...

110 comments:

TrippenIn said...

Hmmm.....

TrippenIn said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sage said...

You are going to have to speak louder Trippenin, you know I have bad hearing. ;)

TrippenIn said...

HMMM....

Lmao

Sage said...

LMAO LAMO...

GeeWhiz said...

Too funny Sage!

Sage said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) has left a new comment on the post "Caption this!":

There's audio, and one of the kids is shouting at Leah to come see the pug the whole time. Bless their hearts, but I still think they are rather unruly and behave like a "pack". It's not their fault. No one has taught them to stop screaming and shouting at each other. If you want Leah to come over, you either calmly call her, or you calmly walk over to her and guide her over. LEAH LEAH LEAH!!!!! is not helpful, and no one is correcting whoever was saying that. I suppose that's what they hear form Kate all the time, shouting and barking orders to get over here.
/////////

LOL You can sure tell BL does not have kids. Can you really see 10 year olds going over and 'calmly' guiding another 10 year old over to see a dog.

I bet she was a fun nanny....not! BL is so anal. LOL

Francie said...

BL must have been a nanny to an only child.

Mary EmDee said...

Wait one dang second... I'm not even 40 yet!! Close but still a few months til the big 4-0.

I wish someone could teach my 12 and 17 y/o that they should CALMLY go and gently clasp each other's hand... Puke that cracks me up. Like that would ever EVER happen. Hahaha

Mary EmDee said...

Isn't 50 the new 20?

Farkle said...

Proper women never tell their age, just saying. :) BL's socks are older than dirt.

merryway said...

Yep, BL must have been one fine nanny. No kids yelling for each other in the park. No wanting to share the fun of playing with a little dog. Nope, that is unruly pack behavior.

I can't believe BL just had to criticize the kids in that short little clip. I wouldn't want her creepy hypercritical and hypocritical standards anywhere near my children.

BL twists and spins to defend and praise Jon. She makes up a reason to criticize his kids. Admit it BL, you don't "advocate" for children, you "advocate" for Jon.

merryway said...

It's so creepy when they want to parent the G children.

She completely forgets about St. Jon. St. Jon doesn't have any problem trusting Kate to keep the children safe or he wouldn't have given up legal custody.

I guess they're just going to keep on ignoring that Jon used his kids in the worse way (again) when gave those phony interviews about custody and a psych eval.

xxxxxxxx

Mel said... 105

Once again, we here are more concerned about the kids'safety than their gestational carrier. #disgusting
April 14, 2014 at 9:47 PM

Micha said...

Mel needs to realize that they are obsessively concerned over people they have absolutely no control over - and it IS #disgusting and a waste of time, too. It's so clear that these 'people' have all the time in the world and nothing better to do - no offspring or family of their own to care about. I DON'T wonder why. :0

Micha said...

P.S. - What video? Anybody have a link? I know the haters have the link and are playing it over and over and over - and are appalled but still watching and re-watching. ;)

Farkle said...

I guess we can thank the Lord that the BL has no children. I live near a park and the kids scream and yell all the time while having fun. Man, she doesn't get out much, so glad she is not around children, now that would be scary. Her average poster must be the age of 68, so those grannies must not have Grandchildren, and if they do, I have read some of their complaints concerning their own children. Ewww------.

merryway said...

Micha, here it is. Some of the G kids are having fun with a cute little pug. It appears the tweeter ran into them in NYC while they were playing in a park.
Her pug is her baby.

It's just a short little video but conspiracy theories are rampant at BL's. BL just can't ever concede that there are some people who like Kate and think she is a good mom. Those people are the "stupid sheeple." So, BL is full swing that this short clip is a setup. Yes, Kate planned it all and is going to achieve great things because her kids loved on a dog in the park.


http://www.mobypicture.com/user/S_a_r_a_h_____/view/16775088

Sarah ‏@S_a_r_a_h_____ 16h

Amazing, Sweet, Happy Kids. Amazing Pug. #GoodMom. @Kateplusmy8 #IStandByKindness. #BeautifulSundayAtThePark. http://moby.to/qdj3kf

TrippenIn said...

Here's the link Micha.

http://www.mobypicture.com/user/S_a_r_a_h_____/view/16775088

TrippenIn said...

Lol Lily,
Did you see where admin said she doesn't usually buy into conspiracy theories?
OMG, she is the queen of conspiracy theories. She just doesn't usually buy into other peoples, is all.

Farkle said...

Thanks Tripp, the BL really should find a new subject, her blog is such a bore, reading junk mail is more entertaining. :)

Micha said...

Thank you merryway and thank you TrippenIn. :)

I'm sure it's adorable - let's face it, the haters would rather hear that the kids are mean and awful and miserable than to hear that they are "amazing, sweet and happy."

merryway said...

LOL Yes Trip, I saw where BL said that.

They have to make such an event out of every little thing.

Quiltart said...

The clip was adorable. Thechildren acted perfectly normal..They were delightful. As usual, the blathering BL doesn't know what she is talking about!

Montana said...

What a nice clip of the happy Gosselin kids.

This geezer has been to busy to obsess over Kate & find great clips.

Thanks again to sages assistants!

Anonymous said...

I have to say the way they have attacked that poor woman on twitter makes them look totally deranged. The kids are obviously happy,healthy and well fed. I remember when the haters used to say the kids were malnourished. I really hope that others will start to see the depths of the craziness that Kate deals with. The haters are making themselves look mentally unstable and obsessive.

Sage said...



Millicent


4:11 PM (23 minutes ago)








to me













Millicent has left a new comment on the post "Caption this!":

...I think the Gosselin children have very little good parenting, and what good parenting they have comes from Jon. I hope that someone helps those children learn some good social skills.
////////////////////

This is laughable on so many levels. I will concede (for the haters concede means: to say that you accept or do not deny the truth or existence of (something)See Jane I know how to use google too!)Jon could teach the kids about peeing in someone's driveway.

Farkle said...

The BL and her posters must have been raised by poor parenting, look what she does as a sideline for $, that they support by associating a lawyer who exploits 3rd world young girls for creeps to look. You have to wonder if they have issues and some of them have paid to support her other site. Wish BV would post her stuff again, maybe finally she will quit stalking a family who has done nothing to her. Jon has no parental skills, hoodies, guns, smokes, booze and parking lot hookups is what is important to him.

TrippenIn said...

Sage Please,
You say that as if pissing in someones driveway isn't classy.
Masturbating on camera for a Tv show is right up there on the 'good parenting' list also.
All good parents teach their children to cuss.
Smoking in alleys, behind the bar is a 'need to know' for all kids.
Yes Jon has so many good qualities to instill in children.

GeeWhiz said...

The video proves Jon lied about his kids to sell an article to the tabloids. Of course the BL will bash it cuz it looks bad on her lying source! I LOL every time they complain about fans/supporters cuz BL & her sheeple go on & on for hours every day about Kate, way more than any fan. It is driving them mad that Kate is still a celebrity!

Tripp you left out giving a vibrator to a woman he's known 2 weeks and drinking & driving. Such an awesome dad, NOT! There's a reason 3 of his kids won't go to his house & it has nothing to do with Kate. If the haters would pay attention to Jon they would see why.

It's really messed up the haters are bashing Kate instead of being happy she has the kids come to NYC weekends, something Jon never did when he lived there.

I hope the haters address/resolve their mommy issues soon so they can have peace in their lives instead of hating Kate, a stranger who doesn't affect their lives at all!

Francie said...

Admin said, "There's audio, and one of the kids is shouting at Leah to come see the pug the whole time. Bless their hearts, but I still think they are rather unruly and behave like a "pack". It's not their fault."

Once again, Admin has grossly mislead her minions. Leah was called for twice is all, and it was not in a loud voice, just a plain ol' calling voice. To me it was a very sweet video of children loving on a pup.

TrippenIn said...

Oh, how could I forget the sex toy.
Well, teaching them to always fire a warning shot is good.

3 or more kids don't even want to see him. Could it be because they don't feel safe? or could it be, it doesn't feel good to be around him.
What would make a child not want to be around their dad?

The kids are of an age now that they can voice to a judge who they want to live with.


GeeWhiz said...

Maybe they don't like Jon & Liz calling their mom names, like they did on CT. Also, I'm sure they didn't like his paid articles bashing them! Geez, what kind of dad does that? A lowlife scum!

Yes the kids can talk to the judge. Hope Kate gets the CT episodes admitted so judge can see how Jon & Liz bashed Kate. They should only get supervised visits!

Farkle said...

New story out--"Kate wants to marry Steve". Every rag has picked it up, does someone need money? Those loons on twitter are having a granny fit over the story.

Micha said...

That was a lovely 37 second video. The kids seemed to be in great spirits. The haters are getting so much to obsess and trash these days, when it comes to Kate. I loved the woman's response to one hater who tweeted her lamenting about it being 29 days since the kids were on twitter and blah blah blah. I get the feeling she never thought such miserable busy bodies even existed.

It's very difficult to speculate about why 3 of the 8 don't want to be in that environment with Jon. Is it Jon? Is it the company he keeps? What happened to make these kids willingly stay away from their father when the other 5 continue to see him? Very sad. It's heartbreaking to think about and it makes me wonder about the other 5 and what they face when they go to see Jon.

merryway said...

LMAO, this comment of BL's get my vote for most lack of self-awareness.

No one lies and twists facts like BL.

BL daily lies about Kate but she has told some real doozies on behalf of Jon. And, what a man Jon is, hiding behind the minion's skirts.

Let's see... There was the cover of People where Jon stated "Kate was a good mother." However, BL's source claimed Jon told People that "Kate was a mother." I still can't believe the minions fell for that one. Then, there's whole 50% custody thing, and the child support that magically went away.

BL has spent years taking up for a pathetic ex reality star who isn't man enough to fight his own battles. BL has straight up lied to her own minions, but they don't have enough self-respect to care.

I think the ROL article is silly. But BL always conveniently forgets that Jon said once school starts, he doesn't see the kids as much but he always has dinner night with them.

xxxxx


Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 29

Dead giveaway it's just a sheeple or Deanna, marginalizing Jon's visitation schedule by incorrectly stating it as "one day a week." That is certainly not what the schedule is and they darn well know it.

It's a free country and you can take up for a pathetic ex reality star who isn't woman enough to fight her own battles all you want, however please do not LIE about the FACTS when doing so.
April 16, 2014 at 7:59 AM

Ms.Anonymous said...

Why is she agreeing with the comments on Radar? Obviously, because the are pro Jon. Why would Jon have to take 6 weeks off from his job to care for the kids? I know that Becks didn't write those comments, but she and her minions repeatedly say that Kate should get a full time nursing job because the kids are older and don't require that much care. I don't think Kate expects him to do anything. He's the one that cries he has first right of refusal when she is unable to be home. As much as he says he wants custody of the kids, and how awful Kate is, you'd think he'd take every opportunity offered him to care for them. He has no desire to have them beyond his designated few days a month.

/////////////////////////////

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 23

(Snipped)
By the way the comments on Radar are mostly pro Jon and many from people with real names who don't seem to know much about this (i.e. not sheeples or haters), saying Jon is not her whipping boy and that it's selfish and unrealistic of her to just expect him to suddenly take six weeks off from his REAL job, she is out of touch with how real jobs work, and that she is doing this for the fame not to exploit her kids. Well done, general population.
April 16, 2014 at 7:41 AM

Quiltart said...

If BL knows so much about what the schedule is, despite that fact that several sources, including Jon, had stated that it's two weekends a month + one dinner a week, why doesn't she just tell us what the schedule is since she seems to know it better than J&K do?

Ms.Anonymous said...

Another example of stupid. Again, why, if Kate is expected to hold a full time nursing job and care for the kids the majority of the time, would Jon need to take 6 weeks off to care for the kids?

///////////////////////////////////

Jane said... 33
Great tweet from ConcernedChick

Concerned Chick ‏@ConcernedChick 31m
So Jon is expected to take a month off of work to save @Kateplusmy8 money for nannies while she's shacking up with Steve in NY? Ha.
April 16, 2014 at 8:25 AM

merryway said...

It's hard to put any stakes in article comments because they are always skewed with the hater socks. Since BL's blog has nothing to do with reality, I'd check the ROL comments out for myself. I bet you anything, that the general population is not agreeing w/BL. LOL

I don't get it Ms A. Yes, why is it necessary for Jon to take off 6 weeks in order to have his own children. He doesn't pay CS so childcare shouldn't be a problem. As the haters always point out, the kids are in school all day.
Thought Jon was going to enforce that all important first right of refusal. But, that would only be for the children that do see him.
LMAO, he can't keep them for a few weeks but he was going to file a emergency petition and seek custody. He certainly keeps BL busy spinning and defending.

TrippenIn said...

Since 3 or more, of the kids don't want to be in Jon's care for even a day, does anyone really believe Kate would want him to help out more?
He's already off Kate's list of help and has been for a long time.
Whoever wrote that article just did it for hater sheeple giggles, IMO.
Money spent for sitters/help, is money well spent.
The less time spent with Jon the less Kate needs to worry about them.

Farkle said...

You have to laugh, she has the facts but has yet to show any proof of her statements on her blog. Another day of her bs, Jon doesn't care what she says, he has to abide by the court and we all know he pays no support, doesn't attend activities for the kids, and barely works. I doubt the kids are staying with Jon, Kate can have help to take care of the kids, school lunches, schedules, etc would not fit into Jon's lifestyle. We know the kids were in NY for the weekend, doubt Jon took them there, he didn't have visitation with them when he lived there. Unless it came from Kate's mouth, the BL has failed again, she needs her blog to creep on Kate and the kids.

merryway said...

ROl has made it apparent they are desperate for Kate stories; the holding hands at a concert story and then taking a pic off Gina Nield's FB that she posted months ago and labeling it as "defiant."

The haters make these ROL articles worthwhile. They live for them. Just another part of their routine of hating on Kate.

TrippenIn said...

I find this really funny, Wasn't it just a few years ago becks was claiming it was her Christian duty to hold another Christians feet to the fire. That she went to church every Sunday, and had all her life.
No mention of that anymore.
That was before her fetish birth site was exposed, of course.
Since then she has come out of the closet.
Now it seems she knows hating is not the Christian way to be.
Now she says this like its a dirty thing to be.
"They are evangelists"



Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 31


I will then discover her to be beautiful, spunky, funny and above all devoted to raising her family in comfort and style.

&&&

Dmasy too funny. Yet in their sad little heads that is EXACTLY what they expect to happen. If there's one thing that's quite fun to watch it's the level of delusion that comes from Kate's camp. I've never seen anything like it. They are so hell bent on saving the world, one hater at a time. They're convinced this can be done. They are evangelists.
April 16, 2014 at 8:05 AM

Sadie May said...

Jon, hire a babysitter. You don't need to take six weeks off. You wanted custody of the kids.This will be what happens if you get them (HA!)You'll have to pay for sitters and that's a big chunk of money.
I think he only wants full custody for the money that will come with it.

Micha said...

Jon spend money on a babysitter? lol Why would he when he can have Kate spend money on a babysitter? ;)

merryway said...

I am getting a real kick out of watching BL try to spin why Jon is unable to care for the kids and work. Forget that the guy was wanting custody asap because his kids were miserable due to Kate's cruelty; it's supposed to be a snap for Kate to work a nursing job and manage the children.

He's a host/waiter. To my knowledge, schedules are usually made out a week at a time.

xxxxxx

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 47

Yes but Tucker that is something that would not happen over night. He would have time to arrange his schedule or childcare, even work it out with Liz, and make a viable long term plan. Kate dumping the kids on him suddenly for six weeks and expecting him to just be there during that time then disappear when she's back is not the same thing. Few employers are going to be able to be flexible to that.
April 16, 2014 at 12:14 PM

Mary EmDee said...

I have never NEVER seen a divorced couple let the other parent take over their house for visitation. That's just nuts to even consider. BL's minions are a tad nutso
---------
Respect said... 50
If Jon had access to the Children's house it would be much easier for him to provide additional parenting time and cut down on paying nannies. He could sleep there after he got off work and take them to the bus in the morning. This "drop off/pick up at the gate" thing is a huge problem in many ways.

Farkle said...

No way would my ex live in my house and take care of my kids if I was divorced. I wish the BL would show proof of how many couples do this kind of thing. Her posters live in la la land, guess they don't understand court orders, Jon is not allowed on the property, it was his own doing that caused the problems. Maybe Jon is working to pay off his DEBTS that he owes and can't take time off from his BUSY (wink) schedule to be a proper Father. I personally would not want Jon to take care of any kids, he can't take of himself. The taco Tuesday and the other 4 days is a challenge for him. I thought by now Jon would have been in court to get his abused kids, what, Jon blew smoke up ROL's azz for a sold story. ROL wants the clicks on their site, it's paid advertisers making money, so I don't read there anymore. Just read Chickies tweet account, the lies are posted there. :)

Sadie May said...

He could have time to bug the house too. lol

Farkle said...

If you read the twitter TL's of the few nuts, they have serious issues. Everything is very sexual with them, ewww, report for spam. It's disgusting.

Nameless in LA said...

Oh, BL, your complete lack of self-awareness is simultaneously pathetic and entertaining. If talking about something that Jon did or didn't do five years ago is obsessive, then what does that make the BL and her merry band of minions, who frequently rehash events in Kate's life from 10 years ago? Twice as obsessive? Just plain cray-cray?
****************
Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 87
The thing that's quite funny is that the more they bring up Jon and make wild and irrelevant accusations about him the more it just looks like desperate deflection. Talking about someone's rent from five years ago, rent that I'm sure a landlord is well capable of taking care of? Good grief. They just don't understand this obsession with Jon does not make Kate look better. It does not "help" Kate. That's not how it works. They aren't inversely related! All it does is make them look like nut jobs and man eaters.

Sage said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) has left a new comment on the post "Caption this!":

The thing that's quite funny is that the more they bring up Jon and make wild and irrelevant accusations about him the more it just looks like desperate deflection. Talking about someone's rent from five years ago, rent that I'm sure a landlord is well capable of taking care of? Good grief. They just don't understand this obsession with Jon does not make Kate look better. It does not "help" Kate. That's not how it works. They aren't inversely related! All it does is make them look like nut jobs and man eaters.

////////////////

Switch out Jon's name for Kate's. I think BL just did a Freudian slip. LOL aometimes this is just way to easy!

DryIce said...

Geeeez Nameless in LA.......I'm going to go with "cray cray". The ding-a-ling BL is as self aware as a turnip. She's a blogging turnip. JMO of course.

Farkle said...

Jon's bills from 5 years ago may still be there, how do you pay back taxes to the tune of 38 grand in a couple of years, when you really don't work. Someone needs a math class. LOL. He also had court fee's, lawyer bills to get out of paying support, and his Taco Tues meal with the girls. $400 bucks for groceries for a weekend visit for the others. Of course you know Kate grifted money from churches alone, even though Jon sat right beside her.


He still didn't pay Hailey either, just chump change to the sum of $88 thousand if what was reported true. Jon's days of mooching are over, you would think she would support her idol with money to keep up his lifestyle.

Nameless in LA said...

Can you imagine having this control freak as your attorney? Her job is not to impose "rules" on her clients, her job is to give legal advice and provide representation. I wonder if there's anyone in her life who isn't subjected to be treated like a child by this patronizing moron?
***************************
With parents who don't get along, this kind of flexibility rarely works, because invariable one or both parents is being selfish, unfair and manipulative. And that's when you tell your client nope, no ifs ands or buts. I don't care if the children are screaming and crying for you...

It may sound like a harsh rule, but it avoids much worse heartache later...

Farkle said...

It depends on the age of the child, joint custody works if cs is paid. The courts have changed, the BL needs to go back to classes. Jon gave up legal custody, too bad BL, your client gave up his kids so that he has no responsibilities. She deflects from facts, something that does not work in a real courtroom.

Sadie May said...

She actually said that? Guess we know why she has so much time on her hands.Most divorced people don't get along. Harsh but true.If she turns down clients for that reason, she's crazy.She has high expectations for people. She'll crash oneday and it won't be pretty.

Farkle said...

I don't think parents are selfish when the other party pays no child support, education fees, medical bills, insurance, etc. Too bad she doesn't understand facts in a court of law and no judge would reward the other parent rewards because his/her attorney plead to the court. Most judges would throw the book at that party, Jon bailed and his kids lost. I do hope the kids use her blog to write their best seller, lawyers would laugh for years at the stupidity of her knowledge of basic law 101. She would be great text book of not what to advise a client.

Nameless in LA said...

Sadie May, I don't think she's turning down clients. Isn't she a public interest lawyer? I think her poor are assigned her. That woman would never make it as an attorney who had to build a client base and keep them happy so they'd pay her. That would involve actual work, not talking about Kate Gosselin all day on the Internet. She gets away with what she does because these poor suckers have no choice but to accept her as their attorney.

Sadie May said...

She probably does her job half-assed if it doesn't Interest her. She's part of the reason the system sucks.

Sage said...

Meg has left a new comment on the post "Caption this!":

@Snotty_Girl: I wish @realDonaldTrump would buy the internet & ban all @Kateplusmy8 haters! 5mins & they'd shrink up like he threw a bucket of H2O on them. 101======= Trump can not stand Kate he just used her for his show. These Kate fans are mental in the head they think no one can talk about Kate. She's a big mouthed bitch no one likes get over it mental fans.
//////////////

Classy. wow, a tad bitter there.

Farkle said...

Sadie,

I agree, those clients really need help, she throws them in the trash so she can blog all day. What a waste of State dollars, she is a jealous that no other firm will hire her. How sad that anyone has to go to her, and the State should be appalled at what she is doing.

Farkle said...

Surviorsucks.com--- spoilers for CA. Kate is still in!


Lets see the haters read here and follow that page every minute until the show is on the air. :)

Don't tweet this out!

merryway said...

This is long, but it was fun. I did a quick search to see the ever-changing stances BL has to take in order to support Jon. BL is trying to justify Jon not caring for his kids while Kate is doing CA. But, BL forgot that "right of first refusal" (which I doubt Jon even has) was supposed to be something grand Jon was granted. Now, BL doesn't care if the kids are screaming for Jon, she says he shouldn't deviate from the schedule.(Which he already admitted happens when school is in session.) In all of this, BL ignores the 3 children who do not see their dad.

BL's current rants.

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 93

...With parents who don't get along, this kind of flexibility rarely works, because invariable one or both parents is being selfish, unfair and manipulative. And that's when you tell your client nope, no ifs ands or buts. I don't care if the children are screaming and crying for you, your job is to the follow the visitation schedule down to the minute and not permit any deviations. Even if your children are left with babysitters...
April 16, 2014 at 5:56 PM


Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 125

Are you suggesting that a parent SHOULD leave them with a babysitter rather than accept the extra days because you don't want the other parent to 'win'? I'm not understanding your logic.

&&&

No! ONLY in contentious divorces and in parental alienation cases. That's all.

Sigh.
April 16, 2014 at 8:51 PM

No mention here of how horrid it would be for Jon to exercise right of first refusal. BL sure is pleased with Jon's working of the lunch shift.

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 98

....I loved the comment about how Jon has the kids "this week" hahaha. Jon has right of first refusal, so that's entirely possible when Kate's out of town. I also noticed he emphasized he works the lunch shift, which makes sense when your kids are in school. Much like we've been saying about TFW all along, the jobs that could work with her kids' schedule are out there. You just have to be willing to stop sticking your nose in the air like Nellie and get your hands dirty.
September 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM

Lol, so many lies in this one. But again, BL championing right of first refusal.

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 172

I can say this because apparently it's already public record. Jon's attorneys are the same firm he had several years ago, the law firm Blank Rome. Several years ago Mary Vidas was his attorney. Not sure if it will be her or someone new. This is the one who I understand was able to get him that midweek visit, right of first refusal, and the change in the ridiculous child support order. We did a post on her and everything looked great about her. She's an expert who even teaches at family law conferences. They are good and he's setting everything up to file in the next few weeks. His new home has five bedrooms.
January 23, 2014 at 5:40 PM

Yes, BL again giving a big shout out for right of first refusal.

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 72

Are you against all working mothers who use nannies or does that rule only apply to Kate Gosselin?

&&&&

No. I'm against working mothers who use nannies when there is a parent ready and willing to take the children. It's called right of first refusal and Jon has it.
August 4, 2012 8:12 AM

merryway said...

Oh shoot, I meant to put those comments up in chronological order. I forgot to move the one on January 23, 2014.

But, you can see that BL flip-flops in the moment.

Farkle said...

Maybe the BL should attend Jon's lawyers conferences, she might learn something about deadbeat Dad's. I doubt Kate has to ask Jon for anything, after all he gave up legal custody and the right for visitation is set by the court, not a lawyer. Good grief, she is hanging by a broken thread over there. Soon the kids will be of age to make their own decisions concerning Jon, there is hope the kids will not have to deal with a Dad who does nasty things for his 5 minutes. CT and peeeing in driveways, gawd, can you imagine if your Dad did that and you had to face your friends?

Mary EmDee said...

Didnt Jon say he wanted to have Kate held in contempt for taking the twins to NYC and not offering him the "right of first refusal" on the others?

So now he was offered it and turned it down? What a donkey

merryway said...

Yep, we can go all the way back to 2011 to see BL's ever-changing stance. Here she is praising Jon for sticking to the schedule after the kids returned from the RV trip. She makes it easy for Jon. According to her, he's in the right whether or not he sees the children any extra time.

BL wants to praise Jon either way. She always wants to slap Kate around for using nannies.

Farkle, I also doubt Kate has to ask Jon anything. I don't think the court would make her rely upon Jon for childcare when she is working. He is not dependable.

xxxxxxxxx

Administrator said... 13

Knows Quality, absolutely right. Jon may very well be sending a strong message to Kate that you don't work the crap out of his kids and want them when they are making you cash, exhaust the hell out of them and then expect him to clean up the mess. Jon is not a dumping ground. They are his children and he has a right to refuse Kate's working-then-dumping little manipulation. Good for Jon, stick to the schedule.

PLLLLUS, believe me after being in family law my entire career, sometimes it's better to just stick to the schedule. Once you start changing things around the other person never lets you forget the "favor" they did you, blah blah turns into a big ole mess. If everyone just STICKS TO THE SCHEDULE, there is no room for sociopaths like Kate to cry fowl. For his own protection I would have no issue advising Jon NO you stick to the schedule for your OWN PROTECTION.

Kate is complaining about being exhausted, all the work she has to do, and no help. She is clearly wishing she could dump those kids on Jon and bitter he ain't falling for it this time.
July 26, 2011 at 7:01 PM

Nameless in LA said...

LOL, the woman is spinning so fast that she can't even keep her story straight from one day to the next, let alone over the course of years. Yesterday, she started with whatever Jon wants to do about custody while Kate's gone is cool to "stick to the schedule at all costs when you're dealing with the evil that is Kate Gosselin. Today, it's back to whatever Jon wants to do is correct. Well of course it is. Little Jonny can do no wrong.

**************************

If he chooses to let Kate give him the kids during this six weeks, no matter how unexpected or inconvenient or manipulative, of course that's understandable. If he chooses not to play her games, that's also understandable. Either one is the right choice.

Farkle said...

Now it's stay with then schedule, don't change things Jon, don't do Kate a favor. Chit, these are his kids, her advice is so not being a real lawyer. Her "source" dried up, so she is back to making up her own stories to fit HER agenda, nothing to do with G's. Where has Jon ever said he makes decisions now concerning the kids, no where! If Jon works a lunch hour, he couldn't afford to feed his kids for a few weeks. He complained about 4 days a month.


Funny how she is suppose to be working, yet has time to blog about someone who has nothing to do with the office she works in. She is a State Tax fraud, if that is who pays her. No wonder CA is broke, she abuses the system and makes it bad for everyone.

Micha said...

What "game" do these crazy haters think Kate is playing with Jon? They always talk about how Jon has to be the first option regarding who watches the kids when Kate's away - so she gave him the option. He turned it down. Where's the "game" factor on Kate's side of this? She's doing what is allegedly part of their agreement. My guess is that if Jon doesn't want to take care of the kids while Kate's away it is a relief to Kate. But would anybody be surprised that Jon supposedly doesn't want more time with his kids. Does it hurt his reputation more than his own antics have already permanently hurt him? I'm still waiting to hear about Jon going to court to demand temporary custody. Remember? That's what he said he was going to do in January! When is that happening? How does that make Jon look?

All these haters thinking Jon is winning something over Kate by not seeing his kids more when given the chance are sad and sorry souls. The kids...I'm partially sad for them if their dad doesn't want more time with them, but partially relieved that they don't have to spend more time with him.

Quiltart said...

The minions have deduced from their tin foil hats that Kate has been eliminated from CA. How anyone else seen evidence of this?

GeeWhiz said...

Happy Easter! Hope y'all have an awesome day with your family and friends.

Sage said...

Happy Easter to you and yours too, GeeWhiz!

Farkle said...

So Kate is home, Jon didn't have to spend a dime on Easter baskets again this year. Bet he had enough money for smokes and beer for himself.

Farkle said...

Happy Easter, a day to reflect, good peeps and chocolate also. :)

Farkle said...

Brandi tweeted she is home, is filming all done for the show?

DryIce said...

Happy Easter!

Sadie May said...

Hope you all have/had a wonderful Easter.

Sage said...

Realitytvkids.com (Administrator) said... 164

No, it's not. They are not 11; not even 10 quite yet, and girls that age still do like princesses.

&&&


REALLY? Not any 10-11 year old girls I've ever known. Is this a regional thing?

The princess stage is 4-5 around here.
////////////////

What a bitchy thing to say about the girls.

BL is slamming the kids more the more it is apparent that they prefer to spend the holidays with Kate than Jon.

Farkle said...

Funny how Jon never takes the kids to church, he has visitation 2 weekends a month. Berks who lives over in another county, stalked Kate's church. She said she had a friend in the church office there, and would post huge whopper stories about the kids. Funny how her (source dried up).

Francie said...

A child can be made up to be a princess through age 12 at the Disney parks. Also, some girls (and grownups) collect certain dolls. How dare anyone criticize a child's gift!

Quiltart said...

I find it refreshing that Kate's children are allowed to ACT THEIR AGE and not be rushed into growing up too fast. The more the BL write, the more obvious it is that she has no children and knows little about child development.

merryway said...

Hope everyone had a lovely day!

I can just see BL going around and snatching toys out of kids hands saying, "you're too old for that, no fun for you!"

My daughter just turned 11, I'd like to see BL try to tell her she's too old to play with her Frozen princess dolls. Lol

BL is certainly not one of those "kid at heart" people is she?

What does she want the G kids doing? I guess they should do nothing but play video games, text their friends and hang at the mall.

They grow up so fast.

Farkle said...

As for the BL being a former nanny (cough) she has no idea about kids. I'm sure she was instructed what the kids would be doing and this made her mad.

Kate is home, spoiler says she did not make the final 4, one will see. Can anyone believe the rags? Brandi said her boys were coming to NY, so a single Mother with an ex who doesn't work might still be in the game????????

Quiltart said...

I read on a spoiler site that Kate made it through the 8th round, which isn't shabby!

Sage said...

I saw that too, Quiltart. Not to shabby for Kate.

Micha said...

I hope everyone had a wonderful Easter!

Are the lunatics at BL's wondering whether Kate took the kids to church for Easter? I will never get used to these people believing that Kate's church going or not going is any of their business. Even on Easter Sunday they are judging and throwing stones at Kate and they don't see how appalling they are. It's very sad.

As for CA. I don't watch competition reality shows much so I always think that making it through the first round of eliminations is a victory. Nobody wants to be the first to go home and it looks like Kate wasn't sent home the first week - which is good. However far she goes it's great that she had the opportunity. The way the haters are obsessing over it is definitely not surprising.

Sage said...

Beyond DIsgusted has left a new comment on the post "Five important lessons from 'The Armstrong Lie'":

..... The thing is that the sheeple think that this is all Kate's doing. Immaculate Conception. Jon had no part in contributing to the genetics of these children, even though all of them look like him and nothing like her. Don't the sheeple see Jon when they look at photos of the kids, or are they convinced that all of them are spittin' images of the gorgeous and de-aging Kate?

/////////////////////////////

Don't the haters see that the kids look like a combination of BOTH their parents?

Why are the haters compelled to remove Kate as their mother?

Do they really adore Jon that much that it blinds them?

Sage said...

Tucker's Mom has left a new comment on the post "Five important lessons from 'The Armstrong Lie'":

Millicent, once again your thoughts are the same as mine. Like you, I post what I think here and am aware that others (often) think differently, but that doesn't stop me from expressing my opinion. When I read that there are sites out there that c/p comments from here and tear apart the comments and the poster, I just shake my head. I don't read those sites, and don't care the least little bit what they say. To me, they are trees falling in the forest with no one to hear the sound!
*****
I think no bullshit board on board has kept this site vibrant.
We can talk about so many other things- things that are for the most part, far more interesting than Kate.
Sometimes, though, I think Milo gets a little to much attention here. I know, I know, I do scroll, but it seems crazy to give him/her/it any attention at all.
/////////////

The sanctimonious have spoken. They think if they don't do board on board it keeps them 'vibrant'. But it is okay to call Milo a 'him/her/it' and c/p fans tweets and make fun of them..even the minors who tweet Kate.

I say it again they have no SELF-AWARENESS!

For not ever reading here they sure seem to know what we write about. LOL

Quiltart said...

There is nothing vibrant about that board. It's a cesspool of ignorant rantings by a bunch of jealous narcissists whose view of the world is so short-sighted that they know nothing about what goes on outside their narrow little world and their equally narrow imaginations.

Nameless in LA said...

I really hope that some of the most sanctimonious are actually BL's socks. They certainly write and think exactly like her. It's far scarier to think there are multiple people just like her out there.

Sage said...

Nameless, I think there are a few people that think like the BL. They may have been subscribers of her birth fetish site and followed her over. Some sound like that type of site subscribers.

I think it is funny they think that parents do not respect their children privacy on f/b when BL shows minors giving birth and being circumcised. That they and the BL are okay with. They slam Kate for showing her kids and their Easter baskets.

Micha said...

Sage said...

Don't the haters see that the kids look like a combination of BOTH their parents?

Why are the haters compelled to remove Kate as their mother?

Do they really adore Jon that much that it blinds them?


Of course the kids are a combination of Jon and Kate...but the haters just see that the kids don't look "white" so therefore they claim the kids look like Jon, but they don't. It's just a way to try to put some sort of distance between the kids and their mom, but it's nonsense. She's their mom. Sometimes kids don't look like their mommies, haters - but it doesn't mean a thing, unless you are a crazy hater. I do think Mady looks like Jon. Jon looks Korean, and so does Mady. None of the other kids look "Korean" so how is it that they look like Jon? If I saw them for the first time I wouldn't guess what their ethnicity is, all I'd see is beautiful kids - because that is what they are.

The haters are big flip floppers. Sure they want to remove Kate as the kids' mother but they also want her to always be with the kids instead of pursuing a career on tv. How many times have they said that Kate should be WITH her kids instead of on this show or that show? That's not removing Kate, that's pretty much the opposite of removing Kate as the kids' mom. The exception to this involves Kate getting a job as a nurse. Then she can be away from the kids to work for an amount of money that the haters deem acceptable for Kate to earn. It's so easy to cut right through the haters' crap and see that they want Kate working her fingers to the bone for a nurse's wage instead of having fun in the "entertainment industry." They don't really care about the KIDS one way or the other.

The haters think of Jon as one of them, that's the only reason they "adore" Jon. They think Jon wants Kate to fail and suffer so of course he can do no wrong. It's typical hater transparency. They are the most obvious people ever.

Francie said...

I'm watching Dancing With the Stars right now and am thinking that Jon would have a very hard time on the show due to the smoking. It would be contradictory to all of the strenuous activity required. That might be why the producers aren't choosing Jon to participate.

Sage said...

Francie, I think DWTS won't choose Jon because, well he is Jon.

Quiltart said...

I'm with you, Sage!

former 15 minute blogger said...

why delete my post? Don't you want to know that the freaks on that hate site criticizing every hair on Kate's head are, in fact, living fucked up lives themselves?

Sage said...

former 15,

Not interested in the link you provided.

You are welcome to post but
don't do that with her or any other poster from 15 again.

Pam said...

Merryway,

Those are interesting comments that you found where BL changes her spin to fit what is going on.

I think you could do the same with Jon.

So is Kate off the Island are still participating? I am out of the loop.

Hope everyone had a wonderful Easter/Passover or just celebrating spring.

Joy In Virginia said...

I have nothing to hide. Go ahead and post my blog. Yeah, I have 'clutter' issues. Wouldn't have named it Joy In Virginia if worried someone would connect me to it.

Mary EmDee said...

Joy- Im not really sure what you are talking about exactly BUT if you have a solution for clutter I really wish you were "Joy In California" since clutter is the Bain of my existence :)!

Sunny said...

Joy,

It doesn't seem to be anyone here that has an issue with your blog or wants to post anything personal about you. Otherwise the comment wold have remained. Sage deleted it and said she had no interest and no one else does either.

Farkle said...

Who's Joy?

Sage said...

She said she was joy from 15.

DryIce said...

Pam, there is a spoiler & speculation site that's deduced Kate was eliminated from the competition in round 8. Has anyone read anything that's confirmed they're right? Like Quiltart said - not too shabby!

I can't wait for CA to start airing! CT was so skeevy I only made it through 3 episodes & 2 of those I can't remember if Jon was even on or mentioned. I've always liked CA anyway - especially the creativity of the challenges.

Farkle said...

Thanks Sage!

Sadie May said...

The Twitter haters are probably trying to set this blog up again. They were saying that one of their Twitter friends named April was getting attacked on her blog by Kate fans.Looks like they're trying to do the same thing here.This type of crap has them written all over it. Joy, Sage wouldn't do that.This is more Twitter haters style.

Mary EmDee said...

That is so stupidly childish to do to a person. Sorry to hear this blog is pulled into the crap again. And for Joy :(

Sage - always quick to put an end to that business here. Thank goodness

Sage said...

NEW POST