Recently, the National Enquirer had a story from allegedly one of Kate's former nannies. What a coincidence that it comes out shortly after Robert Hoffman's (we know Bob as Angelia Rosario here) epic long tell all (it rivals in length Gone With The Wind). Didn't read it and don't plan on it. From what I hear of it, I already read some of it in emails from 'Angela' 3 years ago.
Anyhoo, back to the NE. According to some haters (bleeple) the NE does get their stories right, after all they were right about the John Edwards story back in 2007. That to them is a pretty good accuracy percentage. One in thousands of stories before and since. Oh, I admit, it could be more than one. I can't think of one but I am sure there is two more somewhere.
I was at the grocery store this morning and just like a hater I was looking at the magazine rack while waiting in the check out and trying to decide which magazine I was going to turn around and a story jumped out at me about Angelina Jolie. It was on the cover of the latest NE. Yup, there it was Angie caught in a drug den. Heroin, no less, and dirty. Ange and Brad have adopted kids. The NE gets their stories right. We have seen it 7 years ago with Edwards. With this new enlightenment I am sure their will be outcries from the blog devoted to saving kids or is it just Gosselin kids that deserve to be saved?
I am looking forward to reading the epic long reason why the Gosselin kids deserve to be saved and the Jolie-Pitt kids do not. Actually, I just lied. I could not read that K+8 recap or any recap she writes. BORING and self serving. Can anyone honestly say they read it? Can a bleeple take a swig of rumspringa and be honest with her and tell her that her recaps suck?